Saturday, April 27, 2013

The Muslim Brotherhood wants Spain back. Can the Christians have Egypt in exchange?

 

By Tim Stanley Religion Last updated: April 24th, 2013

The Muslim Brotherhood wants this back

The Islamic Society of North America, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, has published an article that calls Andalusia – the hottest bit of Spain – a “paradise” that will return when “the only victor is Allah.” It reads like part travelogue and part religious tract, claiming that Andalusia was a region of tolerance “for 800 years” when occupied by Muslims, was then ruined by “the insanity following the Spanish reconquista” and, only today, has regained some of its former lustre thanks to growing interest in Islam in the region. Quote: “In 2006, Spanish prime minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero said that Spain was indebted to Islam for its great historical contributions.” Mr Zapatero also legalised gay marriage, so it’s fair to presume that he’s not too keen for the Caliphate to come back.

The article actually makes some very good points. Islamic Andalusia was a cultural centre for western Europe, did tolerate the presence of Jews and Christians and did see a great many natives convert to Islam. Within Spain, that interpretation of history has become institutionalised as the country has tried to make peace with its Muslim minority and preach its own brand of multiculturalism. But it’s only half the story. According to the New York Times:

Andalusian governance was … based on a religious tribal model. Christians and Jews, who shared Islam's Abrahamic past, had the status of dhimmis – alien minorities. They rose high but remained second-class citizens; one 11th-century legal text called them members of "the devil's party." They were subject to special taxes and, often, dress codes. Violence also erupted, including a massacre of thousands of Jews in Grenada in 1066 and the forced exile of many Christians in 1126.

Of course, even this was arguably preferable to what followed the Spanish reconquista – an era characterised by violent mass pogroms against the Jewish population.

Nevertheless, there’s something both creepy and presumptuous about a Muslim writer visiting a Christian country and yearning for its “return” to the fold. Creepy because, for many Islamists (the author of this travelogue not included), that return will be by compulsion rather than evangelical outreach and church picnics: Hassan al-Banna, the founder of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, once wrote that "Andalusia, Sicily, the Balkans, south Italy, and the Roman sea islands were all Islamic lands that have to be restored to the homeland of Islam… it is our right to restore the Islamic Empire its glory."  Such sentiments are also presumptuous because they imply that certain parts of the globe spiritually “belong” to people who “owned” them for a bit in the past. And if we’re really going to divide up the world by that logic, I’d like to make a counter offer to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Can we Christians have North Africa back? After all, it was once a centre of Christian civilisation – some of the earliest Christian communities were found there. You want brilliant theologians – Africa gave us St Augustine. You want devotion – Africa gave us the Desert Fathers. You want beauty – Africa gave us stunning iconography. You want learning – Africa gave us the libraries and schools at Alexandria. So Andalusia for Egypt seems a fair swap. After all, those pagan pyramids can surely be of no use to the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Muslim Brotherhood wants Spain back. Can the Christians have Egypt in exchange? – Telegraph Blogs

Friday, April 26, 2013

Wife gave Zygier 'distressing news' before he died

 Ruth Pollard

Ruth Pollard Middle East Correspondent
April 26, 2013 - 7:02AM

 Ben Zygier

Ben Zygier Photo: Supplied

Just hours before his suicide in an isolation cell in a high-security prison, dual Australian-Israeli citizen Ben Zygier received a visit from his wife who delivered some “distressing news” that left him in “a state of turmoil”, a report from Israel's Justice Ministry claims.

The report does not explain the nature of the distressing news, but notes that it appeared to have a “severe impact on his state of mind".

The revelations add new detail to the hours leading up to Mr Zygier's death and shed further light on a case that Israel has been determined to keep secret.

The two reviews of Mr Zygier's case, one by a senior Israeli court officer, the other by Israel's Attorney-General's Department, were released overnight. The Attorney-General's report concluded that it would not pursue criminal charges of negligence over Mr Zygier's treatment in jail.

It was only after revelations in the Australian media – from the ABC TV and Fairfax Media – that Israel was forced to lift part of its sweeping gag order that prevented any publication of any details of the case.

Until then, the January 2010 arrest and subsequent 11-month imprisonment of Mr Zygier, who was working for the Israeli spy agency Mossad, remained a secret and little was known of the man referred to in court documents only as “Prisoner X”.

Israel has yet to confirm why Mr Zygier was arrested, why it was necessary to keep him under a false name in a high-security isolation cell in Ayalon Prison or what charges he was facing at the time of his death, and there is still “a sweeping gag order” on the matter, the State's Attorney reminded the media on Thursday.

Fairfax Media revealed last month that Mr Zygier, desperate to escape the desk job he had been relegated to by his Mossad superiors, had allegedly launched an operation of his own, unintentionally exposing two top Israeli informants who were spying on Hezbollah, who were later sentenced to 15 years in prison in Lebanon.

Lawyers for Mr Zygier said he was in plea-bargain talks at the time of his death on December 15, 2010, and was facing a prison sentence of up to 20 years.

The reports released on Thursday – one from the State's Attorney and one from Rishon Letzion Magistrate's Court President Judge Daphna Blatman Kedrai – reveal previously unknown details of his wife's visit, as well as multiple assessments on his mental health.

On December 15, 2010 – the day of his death – Mr Zygier's Israeli wife and one of his two daughters entered his cell at 11.10am. By 12.05pm a prison officer reported Mr Zygier was “crying, nervous and upset”.

His mood worsened when the prison officer refused Mr Zygier's request to give his wife a note, the report found, prompting Mr Zygier to “tear up the piece of paper and express rage”.

His wife returned to the cell, and later came out crying, the report said.

Later that day, according to the report, prison guards woke Mr Zygier to take a telephone call from his lawyer.

The report concluded that prison guards did not check on him as often as they were required to that evening and that one of the cameras trained on his cell malfunctioned, the judge's report found.

Guards discovered his body in the shower at 8.19pm.

The report found the 34-year-old prisoner had been examined 14 times by three psychiatrists in the first nine months of his detention – all stated he had denied suicidal intent.

The investigative material also indicates that he saw social workers on 57 occasions without revealing any suicidal inclinations.

However, one doctor who saw Mr Zygier on November 29 noted in her report: “mental state – abnormal findings … depression, deteriorated mood. Has trouble sleeping. Wakes up early. Poor appetite. Dispirited. Tearfulness.”

A subsequent examination by a psychiatrist concluded: “denies suicidal thoughts and without evidence of psychosis or major depression.”

Even though the court found “a specific error, reflected by faulty supervision on the day of the suicide, was the result of negligence” it decided not to charge anyone from the Israeli Prison Service.

And although there was what the report describes as an “unusual event on the day of the incident” it notes that while the “content of the conversations of the deceased with his family members are known today” they were not know to prison officials at the time and could not have been used in a reassessment of his suicide risk.

The Justice Ministry concluded it was not possible to determine "with the degree of certainty required" that Prison Service personnel or others "caused the death of the deceased through negligence”.

Wife gave Zygier 'distressing news' before he died

Mechanic who wrote off £220,000 Lamborghini is fined £280

By Agencies 1:23PM BST 25 Apr 2013

A mechanic who wrote off a £220,000 Lamborghini supercar on an MoT brake test has been fined £280.

A mechanic who wrote off a £220,000 Lamborghini supercar on an MoT brake test has been fined £280.

Owner Stephen Leahy with his £220,000 Lamborghini supercar Photo: Cascade

Andrew Mitchinson, 37, crashed the prized 205mph 6.2 litre Murcielago - owned by millionaire hotel boss Stephen Leahy - leaving it damaged beyond repair.

He also wrote off a stationary Ford Focus, belonging to mother-of-two Marianne Kitchen, when he skidded and lost control on a wet road, South Lakeland magistrates court heard.

He was fined £280, ordered to pay court costs of £350, pay a victim surcharge of £30 to Mr Leahy and given six penalty points.

Afterwards both car owners blasted the sentence. Ms Kitchen said: "Basically all he has got is the equivalent of two speeding tickets for trashing two cars."

Mr Leahy said: "He was a very, very silly lad and he's been given a slap on the wrist."

Peter Bardsley, prosecuting, said witnesses had seen Mitchinson driving the silver, two-door 630 brake horsepower Lamborghini at "excessive speed".

"Due to a combination of a wet road and skidding on a man hole cover, he lost control, left the carriageway for around 40 metres, came back onto it and hit the back of the parked car," said Mr Bardsley.

Magistrates heard that the high-powered supercar was in collision with the Ford Focus parked outside RR Stone on Windermere Road in Staveley.

The Murcielago, of which just 4,099 were made during a nine-year period, had just 24,500 miles on the clock.

The Ford Focus was owned by finance officer Ms Kitchen, 33, of Kendal.

Mitchinson, 37, of Low Skelyghyll Farm, Windermere, admitted driving without due care and attention on November 6 last year while carrying out an MoT on behalf of Station Garage, Staveley, Cumbria, set up by his father, Alan.

After the hearing Mr Leahy, 46, a Lake District hotelier and entrepreneur, said: "I'm appalled he thought it fit to drive like that through a quaint, little country village in a customer's car. He should not be allowed behind the wheel of a customer's car."

Mr Leahy, from Greater Manchester, said despite its capabilities, he had always driven the Lamborghini carefully.

"That car was driven like 'Driving Miss Daisy' and I've always been really careful with it," he said.

"At the end of the day he was a very, very silly lad and he's been given a slap on the wrist."

Ms Kitchen was critical of the sentence received by Mitchinson and described the justice system as "a sham".

"That Ford Focus was my Lamborghini," said Ms Kitchen. "It's the best car I've ever had. It was only three years old.

"Basically all he has got is the equivalent of two speeding tickets for trashing two cars.

"It left us without a car. It was a total write-off.

"I was hoping he would receive some sort of a ban, not a long one but maybe just some sort of re-learning of driving skills because he really should know how important it is not to be trashing cars."

Mitchinson declined to comment on the fine but explained why he had not apologised to both car owners in person.

"I was advised by the solicitors not to contact them because of the court proceedings and they have both been apologised to by the garage," he said.

His father Alan Mitchinson stressed the incident was purely an accident, and it was '"the first accident involving a customer's car for 30 years."

Insurance companies paid out £87,000 to Mr Leahy and £7,500 to Ms Kitchen.

Edited at Telegraph.co.uk by Richard Holt

Mechanic who wrote off £220,000 Lamborghini is fined £280 - Telegraph

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

The facts suggest that the Boston bombing suspects were driven by militant Islam. Mr Obama must face up to this

By Peter Foster World Last updated: April 23rd, 2013

Peter Foster is the Telegraph's US Editor based in Washington DC. He moved to America in January 2012 after three years based in Beijing, where he covered the rise of China. Before that, he was based in New Delhi as South Asia correspondent. He has reported for The Telegraph for more than a decade, covering two Olympic Games, 9/11 in New York, the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami, the post-conflict phases in Afghanistan and Iraq and the 2011 Fukushima disaster in Japan.

If you want to understand why the American Right is fuming about the Left’s attitudes to the Boston bombings, look no further than this stunningly one-eyed article by Glenn Greenwald, The Guardian’s "security and liberty" correspondent.

“Why is Boston 'terrorism' but not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?” he asks rhetorically, before asserting that “there is no known evidence, at least not publicly available, about their [the bombers’] alleged motives”.

“Even those assuming the guilt of the Tsarnaev brothers," he adds, "seem to have no basis at all for claiming that this was an act of 'terrorism' in a way that would meaningfully distinguish it from Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine.”

No basis? I’m not for trial by media, or for wild speculation – you’ll note that the Telegraph has not jumped to conclusions this last week when other media outlets have – but it simply flies in the face of the known facts to suggest that the Boston bombings are indistinguishable from those mass shootings.

So let me try and “meaningfully distinguish” the Boston bombers from the shooters at Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine.

The Boston bombers were unlike the shooters listed above because:

1) They used pipe and pressure-cooker bombs, a type of IED that has been well-documented as being used by al-Qaeda operatives in Pakistan and elsewhere. They did not just use guns, that are all too widely available in the US.

2) The elder of the two bombers, Tamerlan, apparently had a YouTube account with videos celebrating jihad and the millenarian prophesy of the Black Banners – a well-known al-Qaeda meme.

3) According to the FBI’s own statement, a foreign government – presumed to be Russia – raised concerns that Tamerlan was “a follower of radical Islam”, and two US officials have also said that the brothers were religiously motivated.

4) The same warning added that Tamerlan had “changed drastically” since 2010, something corroborated by both friends and family members who say that Tamerlan suddenly started praying "five times a day".

5) Tamerlan, a strict Muslim who did not drink or smoke, rails against the decadence of America – a classic complaint of those who espouse the path of jihad. “There are no values anymore”, worried Tamerlan when interviewed for a photo essay, “people can't control themselves”.

6) And then Tamerlan visited Dagestan for six months, a place where Islamist terrorists are known to proliferate and train, and according to the local police, also seems to have made contact with known militants who were under surveillance.

So while the picture remains incomplete, all the signs are that the Boston bombings were motivated by militant Islam. To say otherwise strikes me as both silly and dangerous.

To point out these facts is not to say all Muslims are militants, or that all Muslims should be kept under surveillance, or to stir up anti-Muslim sentiments – which, as anyone who dips into the US Twitter sphere will know – are alive and well on the Christian Right in America.

It is also not to deny that fears of an anti-Muslim backlash are real, based on what happened after 9/11 and Barack Obama is absolutely right to warn against stereotyping or encouraging, even inadvertently, attacks on the Muslim community.

He is also right I believe – practically, legally and morally – that the surviving bomber, a US citizen, must be tried in a US federal court for his alleged crimes, which do not deserve to be glorified as a "military action".

But wilful blindness to the known facts, is not the answer. Indeed as Michael Mukasey, the former US attorney general, argues in today’s Wall Street Journal, it actually stokes the very same rage and intolerance on the Right that it is aimed at suppressing.

Only by identifying and confronting the “totalitarian ideology” of militant Islam for what it is, can we then differentiate and champion the mainstream Muslim faithful who abhor the violent jihadists who – globally speaking – kill far more Muslims than they do “infidel Americans”.

Over the last five years Mr Obama has been so much at pains to differentiate himself from the Manichean pronouncements of the Bush administration and its "Axis of Evil", that he appears to have lost track of reality.

By not confronting – and separating out – the threat posed by militant Islam, Mr Obama is fanning the flames of conspiracy nuts and anti-Muslim sentiment.

Now is not the time for Mr Obama to duck the issue, but on the contrary to stop treading on egg-shells, and to take the opportunity to deploy his considerable rhetorical skills, and the bully pulpit his office affords him, and start taking the lead on an issue that is not going away, no matter how hard he wishes it would.

The facts suggest that the Boston bombing suspects were driven by militant Islam. Mr Obama must face up to this – Telegraph Blogs

15 facts about planet Earth

Phil Plait April 24, 2013 - 12:01AM

To us, our earth seems huge, solid, tailor-made for us, and permanent.

To us, our earth seems huge, solid, tailor-made for us, and permanent. Photo: NASA

It's easy to take earth for granted, since we see it every day. It becomes - it is - part of life's background.

But when you see the world through the eyes of science, nothing is mundane. We live on the surface of this great giant space-borne water-laden spinning rock, separated from the rest of the Universe beneath a thin veil of nitrogen and oxygen molecules. Even though you're immersed in its influence, what do you really know about the Earth?

Here are some facts about our planet for you to ponder.

1) There are a lot of different ways to measure how long it takes the Earth to go around the sun, but if you say it takes pi x 10 million seconds, you'll only be off by a half a per cent.

2) The earth has a volume of about one trillion cubic kilometres. Can you picture a cube 1000 metres high, 1000 metres deep, 1000 metres across? Now picture a trillion of them. That's the earth.

Actually, if you were that big, it would be easy.

3) The Earth has a mass of 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms, or, if you prefer, 6 sextillion tonnes. In pounds, that's actually . . . 0. Nothing. Mass is a measure of how much stuff an object contains, but weight is how hard gravity pulls on that mass. The earth is in space, orbiting the sun, so it's in freefall. It has mass, but no weight at all.

4) The earth isn't a perfect sphere. It spins, so it's a flattened at the poles a little bit. The diameter through the poles is 12,713.6 kilometres, but it's 12,756.2 kilometres through the equator. That difference of 43 kilometres is only about 0.3 per cent, though, so really we're pretty close to a perfect sphere.

5) Not only is it flattened, but the gravitational forces of the sun and moon (what we call tides) distort its shape even more, pulling bulges out from it. The earth is lumpy! Out in the deep ocean, the bulge of water due to the sun and moon can have an amplitude (change in height from minimum to maximum) of about a metre. The solid earth deforms due to the tides, too, with an amplitude of roughly 50 centimetres. Even the air is affected by tides; though there are several factors that greatly complicate it (like expansion due to heating from the sun during the day, and, simply, weather).

6) There is no physical place where earth's atmosphere stops and space begins; the air just gets thinner and thinner and eventually fades away. But we love definitions, so the official height above the earth's surface considered to be where space begins - called the Krmn line - is at an altitude of 100 km. Anyone who gets higher than that is considered an astronaut.

7) The Moon's radius is about 1/4 that of the earth's, making it the largest satellite compared to its parent planet. Charon, Pluto's biggest moon, is about half the diameter of Pluto itself. So if you don't consider Pluto a planet, the earth and moon win.

8) The moon is farther away from Earth than you think. As an analogy, if the Earth were a basketball, the moon would be the size of a tennis ball 7.4 metres away.

9) The earth's atmosphere is only transparent to a narrow slice of the electromagnetic spectrum. What we call visible light (mostly!) gets through, but most flavours of infrared, ultraviolet, X-rays and gamma-rays are stopped cold. Those last few are dangerous to life as we know it, so that works out well. But it's not a coincidence: if our air didn't protect us, we'd have evolved differently.

10) The earth is warming up. It's a fact. Deal with it.

11) Fewer than 200 impact craters have been catalogued on earth. The moon has billions. We'd have just as many, but our air and water erode them over time, erasing them. Old craters on the earth are hundreds of millions of years old; on the Moon those would be considered young.

12) An asteroid, 2010 TK7, shares an orbit with the earth. It's about 300 metres across, and never gets close enough to us to be a danger.

13) The earth orbits the sun on an ellipse. The shape changes slightly over time due to the influence of the other planets, but on average the closest we get to the sun (perihelion) is about 147.1 million kilometres and the farthest (aphelion) about 152.1 million kilometres. That difference is only about 3 per cent, which by eye is very nearly a perfect circle.

14) If you took all the water on earth and collected it into a single drop, it would be just less than 1400 kilometres across.

15) The earth's atmosphere weighs 5 quintillion kilograms, or 5000 trillion tonnes! You can do this calculation yourself: Weight is equal to pressure times area. Atmospheric pressure on the earth's surface is about 1 kilogram per square centimetre. Multiply that by the number of square centimetres on the earth's surface and you get the weight of all that air. Hint: The area of a sphere is 4 x pie x radius squared. [Note: Yes, I know kilograms are a mass and not a weight.]

And a bonus, because it's important:

16) The earth is the only place in the entire Universe where we know that life exists. But that won't be true forever.

To us, our earth seems huge, solid, tailor-made for us, and permanent. But that is just one perspective, born of living on its surface. From a different perspective, none of those things is true. Seen from space, it looks much less unbreakable. Seen from deep space it shrinks to nothing more than a dot, barely visible in the reflected light of the sun.

From another star, even seeing our planet at all would be a colossal task. We are, after a monumental effort spanning decades, only just now finding other planets orbiting other stars.

Is any like earth? Almost certainly, and in fact there may be billions of planets like ours orbiting alien stars. But while they are like ours, they aren't ours. As with any individual, our world is unique, and precious, and wonderful. Let's keep it that way.

Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is author of Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from Astrology to the Moon Landing 'Hoax' and Death from the Skies! These Are the Ways the Universe Will End.

15 facts about planet Earth

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

The life and (strange) death of Prisoner X

 Jason Koutsoukis March 24, 2013

    Melbourne-born Ben Zygier was a passionate Zionist who aspired to a life of heroism but was responsible for one of the most serious security breaches in Israel's history.

The headstone of the grave of Ben Zygier.

The headstone of the grave of Ben Zygier. Photo: Reuters

One can only speculate about what went through the mind of Melbourne-born Mossad agent Ben Zygier the night he took his own life in Israel's most secure prison cell on December 15, 2010.

Facing a legacy of treachery that is unique in the history of Israel's fabled intelligence agency, Zygier must surely have reflected on the events that moved him to inadvertently betray the country he loved and had sworn to defend.

His dreams of a life of glory shattered, his hopes of redemption crushed, he phoned his mother, Louise, in Melbourne, just hours before his death.

Ben Zygier.

Ben Zygier in the Israeli Defence Force.

It was after 8pm when warders at the Ayalon prison in Ramle, an inland town south-east of Tel Aviv, realised Zygier had not been spotted in his cell for more than an hour. Monitored by three surveillance cameras, the supposedly suicide-proof Cell 15 had been built to house Yigal Amir, the right-wing fanatic who assassinated then Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995.

Divided into two parts, the cell's larger area contains a bed, a sitting area and a kitchenette, while the smaller section houses a shower and toilet.

When the guards finally entered the cell at 8.19pm, they found Zygier's body hanging cold and lifeless.

"Our job is to isolate him, not to keep him alive", said one of the guards who attended the scene.

Even to his prison guards Zygier was known only as "Prisoner X”; his prison file contained no name, no photo, no legal charges. Thanks to a court-ordered ban on any reporting of Zygier's case by the Israeli media, and his parents' determination to keep their son's death a private affair, only fragmentary details had leaked out.

Aired in public for the first time by the ABC's Foreign Correspondent program last month, the circumstances surrounding his death have remained so mysterious that at least one member of Israel's parliament went so far as to suggest that Zygier had been murdered.

But now, after a months-long investigation, it can be revealed that Zygier – albeit unintentionally – crossed a line that no agent before him had ever crossed.

This investigation began with a phone call to Fairfax Media's Jerusalem bureau in October 2009, and was concluded by a team of reporters assembled by Germany's Der Spiegel magazine.

It involved extensive research conducted in Israel, Lebanon, Italy, Britain and Australia, plus interviews with former friends, business partners, employees of several intelligence agencies and governments, and with Zygier himself shortly before his arrest.

This is the story of the tragic downfall of a passionate Zionist, a young man who had aspired to a life of heroism, and yet, in the wake of his own shortcomings, willingly gave away such sensitive information to the enemy that it represents one of the most serious security breaches in Israel's 65-year history.

Growing up in Melbourne's south-eastern suburbs, Zygier enjoyed the happiest of upbringings. His father, Geoffrey, ran the family muesli company before selling the business and taking on senior roles within Melbourne's Jewish community, including a stint as chief executive of the Jewish Community Council of Victoria.

Educated at the King David School, and later at Bialik College, Ben Zygier joined the left-wing Zionist youth movement Hashomer Hatzair. After high school, he began a law degree at Monash University before announcing to family and friends that he was taking time out to live in Israel, where he ended up at Kibbutz Gazit.

Located in the north of the country, in the hills surrounding the Sea of Galilee and close to Israel's border with Lebanon, Kibbutz Gazit is home to about 500 people, including 40-year-old Daniel Leiton, a tall, strong-looking man with big hands and a thick Australian accent.

"Ben was an amazing man," says Leiton, who describes Zygier as one of his best friends. “Cheerful, friendly, warm."

Leiton recalls first meeting Zygier in the late '80s in Melbourne. Even then, he says, the two teenagers shared a passionate belief in Zionism, with Zygier already making it clear he would make Aliyah, the act of immigration for diaspora Jews to the land of Israel. The last time Leiton saw him was in Melbourne, early in 2010, only weeks before Zygier was arrested.

Asked if he noticed him behaving strangely, or whether he seemed tense, or anxious, Leiton says no. “He was as always.”

Unable to imagine his friend locked up in solitary confinement in the high-security Ayalon prison, even less that he was a Mossad agent, Leiton still finds it difficult to comprehend Zygier's apparent suicide. “Unbelievable,” he says.

Another friend of Zygier's was Lior Brand, who shared a living space with Zygier and Leiton at Kibbutz Gazit, and who describes Zygier as “obviously clever, and ready to defend Israel against its enemies, no matter what the cost”.

After living at Kibbutz Gazit, and taking Israeli citizenship under the adopted Hebrew name of Ben Alon, Zygier flitted back and forth between Israel and Australia, in turn completing his law degree at Monash, and completing his military service in Israel.

In this tiny strip of a nation surrounded only by countries either overtly or surreptitiously hostile to its existence, one agency in particular stands ready to accept such people into its ranks: the Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations, known the world over by the Hebrew word for “institute” as the Mossad.

Engaged in a furious shadow war against its enemies, the Mossad's exploits in recent years include the car-bomb assassination of Hezbollah commander Imad Mughniyeh in 2008, the January 2010 killing of Hamas operative Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai and the slaying of at least five Iranian nuclear scientists.

Always on the lookout for Israel's best and brightest talent, at the beginning of the last decade the Mossad began its first-ever public recruitment drive, complete with advertisements promoting “the job of a lifetime”.

“The Mossad is open – not for everyone, but for a few. Maybe for you," said the tagline.

The advertisements caught Zygier's eye, and he responded to the Gmail address at the bottom of one of the ads. For an agency like the Mossad, which depends on its ability to send its agents unsuspected behind enemy lines, foreign-born nationals like Zygier offer an inherently valuable bonus – access to a genuine foreign passport that bears no link to Israel.

At the beginning of 2003, after he had completed an articled clerkship at the Melbourne offices of corporate-law firm Deacons (now Norton Rose), Zygier took a leave of absence and moved to Tel Aviv, where he won a trainee position at prestigious Tel Aviv law firm Herzog, Fox & Ne’eman.

In actual fact, by this time Zygier was already being screened by the Mossad and he was  awaiting news that his application would be successful. As part of that screening process, candidates are interviewed by psychologists looking for obvious flaws or personality traits that might disqualify them from a career in a clandestine intelligence service.

‘‘We’re looking for mentally stable people,’’ says one Israeli psychiatrist who is familiar with the recruitment process.

By December 2003, Zygier had received the good news he was  hoping for and was formally accepted to undergo an intense year-long training program that included mastering such techniques as how to falsify resumes and other documents, and how to manipulate people.

By early 2005 he was ready for his first mission. He was sent to Europe, where he was instructed to  infiltrate companies that had business relationships with countries including Iran and Syria.

One company Zygier had contact with was a high-tech firm in Milan, Italy. Despite initial information provided to Fairfax Media that this company might be a front company owned and operated by the Mossad, subsequent investigations have determined conclusively that this is not the case.

According to Israeli intelligence sources, Zygier also chased other opportunities in eastern Europe and the Balkans.

One chief executive of a mid-sized European company with extensive business interests across the Middle East and Persian Gulf – including Iran – confirmed that he had  hired Zygier for an accounting position.

The CEO described Zygier as “extremely sharp”, and said that while it became obvious Zygier was not trained in accounting, despite his claims, he nevertheless managed to master the requisite skills quickly.

But, having mastered the job and usually being able to finish a full day’s work by as early as 11am, Zygier then started to lose interest in his regular duties. Because of his evident talent, a decision was made to re-assign him to another role within the company that focused on customer relations.

A similar pattern emerged. . Zygier initially thrived in the new role but then began to lose interest to the extent that it started to adversely affect relations with customers.

The CEO said Zygier began behaving rashly with clients, finally causing one major client to sever its links with his company.

And despite his intelligence, Zygier displayed a lack of commitment to the tasks he was assigned  within his company, the CEO said. “So, we had to let him go.”

When confronted with the news Zygier was actually a full-time employee of the Mossad, the CEO said he had struggled to process the fact that his company – a legitimate concern that he had built largely on his own – would have been targeted by Israeli intelligence.

The CEO said that while his company had significant business interests across the Middle East, Zygier never travelled as part of his job and had no face-to-face contact with clients.

He said that never at any stage during the 18 months that he employed him were suspicions raised that Zygier was the clandestine figure he later proved to be.

He said he also remained unsure what advantage, if any, Zygier would have been able to gain on behalf of Israel while working for his company.

By mid 2007, Zygier had, in the eyes of his Mossad superiors, performed without much success. He couldn’t deliver, at least not enough of what Mossad wanted, so a decision was made to bring a reluctant Zygier back from the field to a desk job.
He was ‘‘neither particularly bad nor particularly good, but mediocre,’’ says an Israeli source familiar with Zygier’s case.

Inside the Mossad’s hexagonal headquarters off Tel Aviv’s highway No.5, the agency is divided into three main sections. Keshet, which means rainbow in Hebrew, is the first section, and is responsible for surveillance and other forms of covert intelligence gathering.

The Caesarea department, which is named after the nearby ancient Roman settlement, is home to the Mossad strike force, the men and women who prepare and execute attacks abroad. The largest section is called Tzomet, which is Hebrew for crossroads, a more bureaucratic, less glamorous section that deals mainly with the evaluation and analysis of the information coming in.

For someone like Zygier, this must have been a blow to his self-esteem, with former Mossad insiders describing the work for Tzomet as bureaucratic, complete with routines and supervision an agent can break free from when working abroad.

According to Mossad insiders, organisational changes within Tzomet have meant that once strictly segregated smaller units have been merged into larger teams, with the information being handled across the section becoming more visible to the people working there.

Yet, as subsequent events indicated, this concept of transparency within had a fundamental flaw – giving  Tzomet employees like Zygier access to so much information actually makes them vulnerable.

During the early hours of Saturday, May 16, 2009, Lebanese special forces stormed the house of  Ziad al-Homsi in the village of Saadnayel in the western Bekaa Valley, dragging the startled 61-year-old from his bed.

According to the arrest warrant, Homsi was accused of being an Israeli spy. The warrant even stated his Mossad codename: the Indian.

The arrest came as a shock to many Lebanese, not just because Homsi had been the mayor of his town for years. He was also treated as a war hero because he had fought against Israel on the side of the Palestine Liberation Organisation and the Syrian army during the Lebanese civil war. But, as his friends and family were to soon learn, Homsi had, since 2006, been recruited to work as a spy for Israel, receiving about $US100,000 for his services.

Leaked details from Homsi’s interrogation underscore how important he was to the Mossad, with Homsi revealing he had told his Israeli handlers he could lead them to Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Israel’s mortal enemy, Hezbollah, who has lived in hiding for years, thereby paving the way for another assassination.

The indictment against Homsi revealed the elaborate lengths to which the Mossad went to recruit him.  According to Homsi, a Chinese man named ‘‘David’’ had come to his village in Lebanon, introducing himself to Homsi as an employee of the City of Beijing’s foreign trade office, and claiming that he wanted to establish business ties in Lebanon.

At a meeting in Lebanon, ‘‘David’’ invited Homsi to Beijing to attend a trade fair, telling him that the invitation had come directly from the Chinese government.

Homsi enjoyed a successful visit to Beijing, where he was promised a salary. Later, he was invited to another meeting abroad, this time in Bangkok. But instead of talking business, the people on the other side of the table started asking Homsi what he knew about three Israeli soldiers who had been missing since a 1982 battle that Homsi himself had fought in on the side of the Arabs.

‘‘This is the moment at which the defendant becomes aware that he is dealing with Israelis, who work for the Mossad and have nothing to do with import-export companies or services that search for missing people,’’ reads the Homsi indictment.

Homsi agreed to work for the Mossad, which provided him with a computer and a doctored USB flash drive, as well as a device that looked like a stereo system but was in fact a transmitter for sending messages, all of which were seized after his arrest.

Homsi, says General Ashraf Rifi, the head of Lebanese intelligence, was one of the most important catches his agency had ever made. Homsi was later sentenced to 15 years in prison with hard labour.

The spring of 2009 was a busy time for Lebanese intelligence, which managed to crack open several Israeli spy rings. Another of those arrested was Mustafa Ali Awadeh, code name ‘‘Zuzi’’, another important mole within Hezbollah.

For the Israelis, it was the biggest intelligence setback in the Levant in decades. Officials at Mossad headquarters were baffled. How did the Lebanese manage to track down these men?
An even greater stir was created at Mossad headquarters when it received a tip there had been talk in Hezbollah about a Mossad agent who was currently in Australia and who may be in some danger. It was soon clear that the agent had to be Ben Zygier.

Zygier, frustrated by his desk job, had requested a leave of absence to undertake a master’s of management degree at Monash University.

The Mossad personnel department approved the request and by the beginning of 2009 Zygier had enrolled under the name of Benjamin Allen and was back living in Melbourne.

He told a fellow student that he had worked for the PricewaterhouseCoopers management consulting firm in Geneva, and that he occasionally had to return to Switzerland for the firm. It explained his many trips.

‘‘Ben was obsessed with the notion of keeping fit,’’ a former fellow student recalled.’’ He always ate well and paid attention to his health.’’

In October 2009, Fairfax Media received a tip from an Australian source about three dual Australian-Israeli citizens suspected of working on behalf of Israeli intelligence, using their Australian identities as cover. One of  the names supplied was that of Ben Zygier, but when Fairfax confronted him with the allegations in December 2009 and January 2010, he vociferously denied all such suggestions, dismissing the information as fanciful.

In early January 2010, Zygier’s Mossad superiors decided to call him back to Tel Aviv, not because they yet suspected him of leaking information to the Lebanese, but out of concern for his safety, which stemmed from the tip that Hezbollah appeared to know his identity.

Zygier’s superiors had also received reports that he had breached protocol by talking openly about the fact  he was a Mossad agent, and wanted to warn him to be more discreet.

It was not until Zygier was back in Israel, where it was thought that there was something odd about his behaviour, the suspicion arose that he might have had a role in the arrests in Lebanon.

By January 29, 2010, that suspicion was sufficient to order members of Israel’s General Security Service, better known by its two-letter Hebrew abbreviation as the Shin Bet, to arrest Zygier. The story they uncovered during the internal investigation that followed shocked them.

Zygier, apparently frustrated by his demotion to a desk job, had decided to take matters into his own hands and find a way to rehabilitate his reputation in the organisation.

Under intense questioning from the Shin Bet, he broke down and admitted that sometime in 2008, before he took his leave of absence and moved to Australia, he had flown to eastern Europe to meet a man he knew to have close links with Hezbollah, with the intention of turning that person into a double agent.

Instead, the man reported the recruitment attempt to Beirut, and himself began playing the same game as Zygier, except in reverse. Without Zygier’s knowledge, the man was reporting every detail of his contact with Zygier back to the Hezbollah leadership in Beirut. Israeli officials believe even Hassan Nasrallah himself was being kept informed.

The contact between Zygier and the man went on for months. When the man asked Zygier for proof he was a real Mossad agent, Zygier readily complied and began supplying him with real intelligence from Tel Aviv, including the names of Ziad al-Homsi and Mustafa Ali Awadeh, the Mossad’s two top informants in Lebanon.

Israeli officials with access to the probe say that when Zygier was arrested, he was also found carrying a compact disc with additional classified information from the Tzomet department, which they believe he was also preparing to hand over to the other side.

At a meeting in Tel Aviv this month, a black limousine with darkened windows drove into a public car park, bringing a reporter to a meeting with an Israeli government official.

‘‘Zygier wanted to achieve something that he didn’t end up getting,’’ said the official, who is familiar with the investigation. ‘‘And then he ended up on a precipitous path. He crossed paths with someone who was much more professional than he was.’’

At some point, he says, Zygier crossed a red line and went to the dark side. His fate, the official points out, was largely a matter of psychology.

Israeli informants have certainly changed sides in the past. But a regular Mossad employee has never done what Zygier did. It is a bitter defeat for the Mossad, but for Hezbollah it is one of the rare instances in which an Arab intelligence service prevailed over its Jewish counterpart.

Zygier’s actions are also a heavy blow to the Mossad because they raise doubts as to the integrity of the agency’s own people – and the manner in which it recruits employees.

Lior Brand, one of Zygier’s friends from Kibbutz Gazit, believes Zygier simply wasn’t up to the task. The lies, the silence and the loneliness were too much for him, says Brand, adding the Mossad ‘‘made a big mistake’’ by recruiting him. He says he will never forgive it for recruiting the wrong person.

Negotiations over Zygier’s sentence were conducted behind the scenes in December 2010. The Mossad and Shin Bet wanted to set an example and demanded he  spend at least 10 years in prison.

While he was in prison, in the summer of 2010, Zygier’s second daughter was born, and the family was permitted to visit him occasionally. What truly motivated Ben Zygier? Was it wounded pride? Vanity? A lack of professionalism?

Perhaps his parents could answer these questions, but they have chosen to stay silent. What can be ruled out is that money played any role.

After Israeli officials released Zygier’s body, the family invited his closest friends to the funeral, including Daniel Leiton from Kibbutz Gazit. Leiton went to the cemetery and asked why Zygier had to die, but he didn’t get an answer. ‘‘No one talked about why, at 34, he suddenly died.’’

Leiton says that while he still loves Israel, something went terribly wrong in this case.

The inscription engraved on Zygier’s polished black tombstone in a cemetery in Springvale reads : ‘‘Blessed be the judge of truth.’’


Jason Koutsoukis is a former Fairfax Middle East correspondent.

The life and strange death of Prisoner X

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Margaret Thatcher's funeral arrangements under fire as Big Ben is silenced

Nicholas Watt and Rajeev Syal The Guardian, Tuesday 16 April 2013

Diane Abbott criticises ceremony and senior Tory says the Queen has been placed in an invidious position

Margaret Thatcher funeral rehearsal

Margaret Thatcher funeral rehearsal: a coffin is carried up the steps of St Paul's Cathedral by military personnel from the three armed forces. Photograph: Carl Court/AFP

The bells of Big Ben and the Great Clock at Westminster are to be silenced as a mark of respect during Wednesday's ceremonial funeral for Lady Thatcher, the Commons Speaker has announced.

As unease about the scale of the funeral spread across political parties, John Bercow told MPs that silencing the bells was the most fitting tribute to the late prime minister following a number of representations. It is thought the bells were last silenced as a mark of respect during the funeral of Winston Churchill in 1965.

But the statement by Bercow came as Diane Abbott, the shadow health minister, became the first member of the Labour frontbench to criticise the funeral, which will involve more than 700 military personnel from the three armed forces.

One senior Tory is planning to boycott the funeral on the grounds that the Queen, whose aides are understood to have raised concerns about associating a divisive prime minister with the military on such a large scale, has been placed in an invidious position. It is understood that a number of Tories blame Gordon Brown for pushing for such a large scale funeral for Thatcher when he was prime minister, giving the palace no choice but to accept an invitation for the Queen on the grounds that the ceremony has cross-party consensus.

Ben Wallace, the Tory MP for Wyre and Preston North who is ministerial aide to Kenneth Clarke and who served in the Scots Guards, tweeted: "Most of funeral planned in 2008."

Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister in charge of organising Thatcher's funeral – Operation True Blue – has also come under fire amid accusations that he is planning to conceal the event's true costs from the public by omitting the wage bills of police officers and service personnel. Maude said the money paid to uniformed officers should not be included when calculating the overall costs to the public purse, an accounting manoeuvre that breaks with precedent. Calculations of the costs of the Queen Mother and Princess Diana's funeral included the costs of paying police and the armed services.

Labour MPs described the move by Maude as "indefensible". But Bercow said parliament would pay another tribute to the late prime minister when Big Ben is silenced during her funeral.

The Speaker told MPs: "I have received a number of representations, direct and indirect, formal and informal, concerning how the house and parliament as an institution might best mark this occasion. I have considered all of these, but concluded that the most appropriate means of indicating our sentiments would be for the chimes of Big Ben and for the chimes of the Great Clock to be silent for the duration of the funeral proceedings.

"I have therefore made the necessary arrangements to achieve this. I believe that there can be a profound dignity and deep respect expressed in and through silence and I'm sure that the house will agree."

Maude welcomed the Speaker's announcement. He told the Commons: "I am confident that this will be seen as a very dignified and respectful gesture on the part of parliament and I am very grateful to you. I am confident that Lady Thatcher's family will take it very much in that spirit and be hugely appreciative of what you have decided."

Big Ben is the main bell of the Great Clock atop Elizabeth Tower – named after the Queen in her diamond jubilee year in 2012 – which sounds every 15 minutes. It has occasionally failed to sound since it first chimed in 1859. But it was intentionally silenced for two years during the first world war when the clock was darkened to deter German Zeppelins, according to a report by the Associated Press in 2009 marking Big Ben's 150th anniversary.

John Mann, the Labour MP for Bassetlaw, was highly critical of the announcement. "I imagine [Lady Thatcher] wouldn't be too happy with this. The Luftwaffe couldn't silence Big Ben so I wouldn't have imagined she'd be at all in favour. But personally I am not bothered because it doesn't cost anything. My concern is all this money that is being spent on the funeral. No politician should be receiving a state funeral or semi-state funeral now or in the future."

Mann's remarks were echoed by Abbott, who criticised the arrangements for Thatcher's funeral. Her coffin will be drawn on a gun carriage of the King's Troop Royal Horse Artillery from St Clement Danes church – the church of the Royal Air Force in the Strand – to St Paul's Cathedral.

The shadow public health minister told BBC London: "It goes against all protocol … Winston Churchill was different. He led a national government."

The Labour MP John Healey, the former housing minister who boycotted last week's parliamentary tributes to Thatcher, said military personnel and policing costs were likely to be a large part of the taxpayers' bill. "The public have a right to see a full account of the costs of the funeral. Any attempt to cover up part of the costs of this funeral is indefensible and likely to be unsustainable.

"This is a state funeral in all but name without the consent of parliament for funding and without the consent of the people. Churchill, who was the only PM over the past 100 years to have a state funeral, unified the country, while Margaret Thatcher divided it."

Ministers have responded by accusing Labour MPs of failing to maintain the tone of their leader, Ed Miliband, who was widely praised for his Commons statement on Thatcher. A government source said: "We are surprised that Labour are trying to play politics over a ceremonial funeral for a former prime minister, particularly given that the outline of the funeral was agreed under Gordon Brown."

Maude told Radio 4's Any Questions programme on Friday that reports that the funeral will cost £10m had mistakenly included the costs of police and soldiers who would be working anyway. "There are costs which are people doing their ordinary jobs which are costs which are being borne in any event. We have not hired more soldiers, we haven't hired more police. There is no one who has been hired who would not be doing their ordinary jobs which they would not be doing in any event. We are not hiring more police."

George Galloway, the Respect MP, is due to try and force a commons vote to prevent the cancellation of prime minister's questions to allow MPs to attend the funeral. He told BBC2's Daily Politics: "We're spending £10m on the canonisation of this wicked woman, this woman who laid waste to industrial Britain, to the north, to Scotland, to south Wales. We've already had the recall of parliament last week, with MPs being paid up to £3,700 to fly back from the Caribbean holiday that they were on and then fly back to start their holiday again, for a totally unnecessary fawning over this woman. And now they want to cancel prime minister's questions. It's absurd."

The Guardian understands that more than 3,000 police officers had leave cancelled and will be informed on Tuesday if they are needed to help secure the route of the cortege amid plans for mass protests.

The scale and the cost to the taxpayer of the funeral has been criticised by public figures including the Bishop of Grantham, Lord Prescott and George Galloway. It has been widely reported that the event will cost £10m. Previous ceremonial funerals have included "opportunity costs", which would have been incurred anyway if staff were assigned to other operations.

The Queen Mother's funeral – the last grand ceremonial funeral in Britain – cost £8.16m to the public purse, according the Guardian's calculations. Policing cost the Metropolitan Police £4.3m of which £2.3m was defined as "opportunity costs".

On Monday night the White House announced that Barack Obama had asked former secretaries of state George Shultz and James A Baker III to lead what might be seen as a low-key delegation to Thatcher's funeral.

Shultz served as secretary of state to President Ronald Reagan and Baker to President George HW Bush. Both served in the position while Thatcher was in office.

The White House said other delegation members would be Barbara Stephenson, the charge d'affaires at the US embassy in London, and Louis Susman, the former US ambassador to the United Kingdom.

House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner said he was sending three Republican members of Congress: Marsha Blackburn, Michele Bachmann and George Holding.

Margaret Thatcher's funeral arrangements under fire as Big Ben is silenced | Politics | The Guardian

Monday, April 15, 2013

British widow: 'I face ruin from Cyprus crisis'

Helena Smith The Observer, Sunday 14 April 2013

Sharon Connor stands to lose upwards of €50,000 after her profits from a house sale remain frozen in a bank on the island

Sharon Connor

Sharon Connor, the money from the sale of her house in Cyprus is frozen in the Cyprus bank crisis. Photograph: Graham Turner for the Guardian

Tragedy first struck Sharon Connor when her husband, Gary, was killed by a heart attack in January last year. He had just turned 54. From running a successful scuba-diving business on Cyprus, the mother-of-two found herself catapulted into a world of grief, unable to even visit the ornate, two-storey villa the couple had bought on the island.

"It took me five months before I could set foot in the place," said Connor, who was on her own when she found her husband dead in bed. "I still have flashbacks and see it in my head all the time."

In March the widow decided to put the property on the market. In the space of three days she had found a buyer, located a new home in the UK and a job outside London. "I was trying to move forward with my life," the 55-year-old told the Observer from Kent, "until I found myself caught up in the nightmare scenario that has befallen Cyprus".

This weekend the Briton faces the prospect of financial ruin following the shattering news that the proceeds from her house sale – €181,000 (£155,000) – will remain frozen in the Bank of Cyprus as a result of capital controls enforced to contain the crisis.

As the size of Cyprus's bailout requirements swelled from €17bn to €23bn, she learned that the money, deposited in a special account for the purposes of the transaction, could not be transferred to the UK. Now she lives in fear that, like other depositors with more than €100,000 in Cyprus, she will also fall victim to the raid on savings that the Cypriot government has been ordered to implement as the price of international aid.

"It is totally unfair. My funds should not be frozen, as they are not savings that have been accruing interest," said Connor, whose misfortune was that the money hit her account two hours before the close of business on 15 March.

"It was money from a real estate sale that was supposed to be in the bank for a single day. The same day it went in, I sent an email instructing the bank to transfer the funds – some of which were in euros and some in sterling – to the UK, but on Saturday morning the news broke that Cypriot banks were in major financial difficulty."

Ever since then Connor, who was due last week to buy a three-bedroom semi in Kent, has been battling to get her money released. She has written to "everyone who is anyone", including David Cameron and Angela Merkel, and started a Facebook campaign called "Gary and Sharon v Merkel".

"Every day is a struggle," said the widow, who is from Welling in south-east London. "I was set on moving on after Gary passed last year and had everything in motion when, overnight, my world was turned upside down again … it is a scenario that had made me physically ill."

Connor has calculated that she could lose €50,000 (£42,000) as a result of the emergency levy that Nicosia must now enact to qualify for financial assistance from the EU and the International Monetary Fund. Revelations that the beleaguered Cypriot government will have to find almost double the amount to meet the terms of the €10bn bailout – amid signs that the EU's wealthy north has tired of rescuing the bloc's heavily indebted south – have only sharpened her anguish. "Now I live in worry that with the latest news that Cyprus's bailout requirements are going to be much bigger than thought, depositors will suffer even more," she said.

Connor had hoped to be exempted from the levy – along with other special cases – but her appeal for dispensation was turned down by the island's central bank last week. On Friday she was told by the Bank of Cyprus that it was seeking clarification. "I asked my representative at the Bank of Cyprus to put forward my appeal to the central bank, and in turn they asked for the contract of sale and solicitors' details," she recalled. "Last week the central bank committee declined the request. I was also told that I cannot transfer any funds from my accounts to the UK."

In a cruel twist of fate, the sale was due to have been completed a week earlier. "A document was missing from the necessary paperwork that prevented the deal from being closed," she said. "Had the transaction gone through as originally planned, the funds would now be in my British bank account."

Connor, who also has five grandchildren, has now been forced to cash in her two private pension schemes to make ends meet. "I have my furniture in storage with no way of knowing when, or if, I can purchase my own property," she said. "The local council will not put me on their housing register as I have funds from the sale of a house in the bank, albeit I cannot access them."

Had it not been for the help of friends and family, she says, she might not have got through the ordeal. "If it was not for the goodness of my sister, Theresa, and other family members, I would be homeless," she said. "I live in hope that common sense will prevail and I will receive what is rightfully mine. This is money that my husband and I have accumulated and worked for our whole lives."

British widow: 'I face ruin from Cyprus crisis' | World news | The Observer

Leading German economist calls for dissolution of euro zone to save EU

Kate Connolly in Berlin guardian.co.uk, Sunday 14 April 2013 16.02 BST

Joachim Starbatty speaks out as breakaway Eurosceptic party Alternative für Deutschland holds founding conference

Economist Joachim Starbatty of the anti-euro Alternative für Deutschland

Economics professor Joachim Starbatty addresses the first informal meeting of anti-euro party Alternative für Deutschland in March. Photograph: Kai Pfaffenbach/Reuters

One of Germany's most eminent economists has called for the swift dissolution of the euro zone in its present form, arguing that the vision of a united Europe is in danger of imploding if debt-ridden countries are not shown the door.

Speaking before the founding conference on Sunday of a new breakaway political movement which wants to fiercely challenge Germany's support for euro zone bailouts, Joachim Starbatty, a professor of political economics who has filed repeated complaints with Germany's constitutional court arguing that euro zone bailouts are unconstitutional, said the EU would collapse if the euro zone battle was allowed to continue.

"Europe is tearing itself apart right now," said Starbatty. "A currency which is supposed to have united a continent is doing precisely the opposite. And it is weak and ailing largely due to the fact that individual members are no longer in the position to be able to sustain it. Therefore it would be better if these countries that are not competitive, like Greece, Ireland, Spain, Italy, etc, were to leave." An alternative, he argued, would be for Germany to leave.

Starbatty is a staunch supporter of Alternative für Deutschland (Alternatives for Germany), which held its inaugural party conference on Sunday. The movement is made up of intellectuals, from surgeons to economists – the number of professors has caused it to be dubbed the "professor party" — as well as small and medium business leaders and retired professionals. It already has 6,000 members and is set to liven up Germany's national election in six months' time.

With a name inspired by "alternativlos", meaning "there are no alternatives" – a word which the chancellor, Angela Merkel, has used in defence of many of her policies including euro zone bailouts – the party wants to prove her wrong, particularly in the case of the euro. Many would like to see the return of the deutschmark.

Analysts are sceptical that AfD will garner the 5% of votes necessary to gain seats in the Bundestag.

"Economically Germany is continuing to doing well, which impairs the chances of protest parties considerably," said Richard Hilmer from the opinion pollsters Infratest Dimap.

But AfD still poses a grave threat to Merkel's Christian Democrats (CDU), their Bavarian sister party, the CSU, and the pro-business Free Democrats, all of which are in a coalition which they hope will be re-elected on 22 September.

Even the loss of a few hundred seats could force Merkel to invite the centre-left Social Democrats to join her in a grand coalition, which would necessitate a watering down of her policies, or cost her power altogether.

"At the election any votes for the AfD could really hurt the CDU," admitted Wolfgang Bosbach of the CDU. His colleague Klaus-Peter Willsch added: "Such a party is dangerous for us."

Starbatty says the AfD's aim is to "shake awake the political elite" of both Germany and Europe. His profile is typical of that of other members – a long-standing member of the CDU who left in protest at how Germany has been forced into the role of Europe's disciplinarian in order to uphold its pro-European stance as it tries to save a currency which he argues was "flawed from birth".

"Many German politicians are sticking their heads into the sand," he said.

"They do not want to admit the reality that their dream project cannot continue to function in its current state because they believe so much in the dream and they fear being seen as anti-European.

"They fail to recognise we need to find a healthy way forward, which despite being painful will help propel Europe upwards."

The 72-year old, who describes himself as an economist of the Adam Smith school, recalled the then chancellor Konrad Adenauer's first visit to Greece in the 1950s. "Then, only seven policemen were needed. When Merkel visited in 2012, 7,000 police protected her. What does that tell you about the feelings of solidarity Europe is supposed to have forged?"

Starbatty resents the label "anti-European" that the party is often given, preferring instead "Eurosceptic". He also rejects the comparisons with Ukip, with which he says AfD has very little in common.

"We are pro-Europe – we want to save it, and the only way to do that is to either dissolve or consolidate the euro zone. It is not, nor will it in its current form, bringing the peace and unity that its creators promised," he insisted.

The party is screening all potential members to ensure no far-right elements enter its ranks, after criticisms that it would attract neo-Nazis.

"This comes from the German idea that if you're not with the majority you must have extremist leanings," said Starbatty. That is one of the reasons it is far from easy to found a new party in Germany.

Rejecting outright as it does the policies of Merkel, the party is far more inclined to align itself with the British prime minister, David Cameron.

"We're by far from being in agreement with everything Cameron says, but we respect his plan to hold a referendum," said Konrad Adam, a journalist and former publisher of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung who is one of the founding members of AfD.

"He has a British sense of realism, a cool and healthy approach, which we could do with more of in Germany," added Starbatty.

A recent poll suggested that 26% of Germans, fearful of the future of their economy and resentful that their savings had suffered, were prepared to vote for an anti-euro party. The figure rose to 40% for the 40 to 49-year-old age group.

But one problem the fledgling party might face is the advanced average age of its members which one observer estimated to be "only slightly under that of the Vatican conclave", But the party's would-be leadership insisted that many younger supporters are waiting in the wings to "see how the party develops before committing themselves".

Leading German economist calls for dissolution of euro zone to save EU | World news | guardian.co.uk

Friday, April 12, 2013

Migrants get jobs because we’re not prepared to work as hard

 Boris Johnson

By Boris Johnson 9:13PM BST 07 Apr 2013

Labour’s education policies left our young people lacking the skills or ambition to compete, writes Boris Johnson

Why would anyone give the Treasury back to Labour?

Do you know what, I think the longest, coldest winter I can remember is finally on the verge of packing it in. I can see a pretty little vixen gambolling in the garden. Some pigeons are doing heavy petting in the tree. And the pedestrians of London are getting more talkative as I pass by on my bike.

For months they have had their noses in their scarves, heads down, eyes weeping. Now they are shouting at the traffic lights again, and revealing the most interesting things. The other day a woman came up to me, as I waited religiously for green, and gave me a clear insight into why Labour doesn’t deserve to win the next election — and why, indeed, it almost certainly won’t.

She was called Katie and she was a recruitment consultant for a group of swish restaurants. In other words, she was on the lookout for people to be chefs, waiters, sommeliers, hat-check people: that kind of thing. The restaurant business is one of many in which London now leads the planet, and I was keen to know how things were going. If the tables at London’s top-end eateries are full of people chomping through foie gras, then that is good news for many hundreds of thousands of families, on modest incomes, who depend on a thriving catering industry.

As the top chef Raymond Blanc pointed out the other day, the catering world has amazing opportunities for young people to get started on good careers, and Raymond is helping, with Tim Campbell, to lead our campaign to create 250,000 new apprenticeships. A booming restaurant trade is potentially very good news for the 100,000 16 to 24-year-olds who are currently out of work and on benefits. So I was agog to hear from Katie. “How’s business?” I asked.

Katie said that things were very good — never better, in fact. She had 20 vacancies in just five restaurants, and her services as a talent-spotter were much in demand. “Fantastic!” I said, and made a mental note that this chimed with recent statistics showing that employment in London was now at 70.3 per cent, an all-time high.

Then a thought occurred. “Er, tell me,” I said, “what proportion of the people you employ are, you know, from London? I mean, how many of them are, ahem, British?”

Katie looked embarrassed. She knew exactly what I was driving at.

“To be honest, about 10 per cent,” she said. “But why?” I asked. “Why is it that these jobs are not being done by London kids? What can I do about it?” The restaurant recruitment consultant looked thoughtful. “It’s the schools, I think,” she said. “They teach the kids that they can earn all this money but they don’t explain that they will have to work hard. The people I recruit — they have a different work ethic.”

Now we all know that what Katie is saying is true, and we all know that it isn’t enough to blame the immigrants. For starters, we can’t kick people out when they are legally entitled to be here under EU rules. Second, and much more important, it is economically illiterate to blame Eastern Europeans for getting up early and working hard and being polite and helpful and therefore enabling the London catering trade to flourish.

There isn’t some fixed “lump of labour” that means these jobs would otherwise be done by native Britons. The chances are that there would be fewer restaurants, since the costs would be higher and the service less good and the reputation of London as the world capital of posh tucker would be less exalted than it is today.

The failing lies with the last Labour government, which did not do enough to reform our education system and to make sure that young people were prepared for the jobs market.

London schools have been getting better — and it is a fact that even in some of the poorest parts of the city, schools are now performing better than those in many other parts of the country. Some good work was done by Tony Blair and Andrew Adonis in trying to free up education — and yet they were blocked at every turn by Gordon Brown and the teaching unions. As Blair once said, he had the scars on his back to prove it.

The result is that huge numbers still leave primary school — about one in four — unable to read or write properly or to do basic maths. No wonder they will lose out, in the jobs market, to industrious people from Eastern Europe who can take down a telephone message correctly.

Labour spent its time in government — a long period of economic plenty made possible by the Thatcherian supply-side reforms — on a protracted borrowing binge.

They borrowed people from other countries to fill this country’s skills gap and to keep costs down — and did nothing like enough to reform our education system to enable young people to cope with that competition. They borrowed astronomic sums to maintain the welfare state and all its bureaucratic appurtenances — and did absolutely nothing to reform the system so that we could cope when money was scarcer.

All these reforms must now be carried out, by Conservatives, against a tough economic backdrop. It is not easy, and it means saying some hard things. We need to explain to young people that there can be glory and interest in any job, and that you can begin as a waiter and end as a zillionaire. And it is time, frankly, that London government — boroughs and City Hall — had a greater strategic role in skills, so that we can work with business to make sure that (for instance) catering gets the home-grown talent it needs.

Above all, we must support Michael Gove in driving up standards in schools — and what does Labour have to say? Nothing, except to join the chorus of union-led obstructionism. What does Labour have to say about welfare? Nothing, except apparently to support every detail of the system that gave Mick Philpott the equivalent of £100,000 a year. Well, nothing will come of nothing.

Why would anyone give the Treasury back to the people who wrote these vast blank cheques against the future? Why give the key back to the guys who crashed the car?

Migrants get jobs because we’re not prepared to work as hard - Telegraph

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Slovenia could be next candidate for euro zone bailout

Josephine Moulds guardian.co.uk, Thursday 28 March 2013 15.04 GMT

Former Yugoslav republic is struggling with troubled banking sector that threatens to bring down economy

Slovenian bank

A bank branch in Ljubljana. Slovenian banks have €7bn of bad loans on their books. Photograph: Marco Secchi/Getty Images

Slovenia – famed for not very much – is fast emerging as the latest contender for a euro zone bailout.

Nestling between Croatia and Italy, this country of almost 2 million people may be best remembered in the UK for losing to England at the last football World Cup.

With risotto from Italy, goulash from Hungary and strudel from Austria, its cuisine is heavily influenced by its neighbours. But when it comes to its finances, Slovenia follows more closely in the footsteps of Spain and Ireland, with a large, troubled banking sector that threatens to bring down its economy.

The once-booming former Yugoslav republic was plunged into recession by the economic crisis, which dented demand for its exports of manufactured goods, machinery and transport equipment, chemicals and food. The economy is expected to shrink by at least 2% this year.

But the statistic that has everyone concerned is the €7bn (£6bn) of bad loans on Slovenian banks' books, an amount equivalent to around a fifth of its GDP. The rating agency Moody's has already downgraded Slovenia's second largest bank, and the IMF has estimated that the government needs to recapitalise Slovenian lenders to the tune of at least €1bn.

Perhaps most worrying is the fact that the prime minister, Alenka Bratušek, was moved to say this week that her country would not be seeking a bailout.

Bond investors are not taking any chances. Prices of Slovenian government debt have plunged, sending yields rising by an eye-watering 0.8% on Wednesday alone. Slovenia's 10-year debt is now yielding around 6.15%, not far from the 6.49% yield on 10-year bonds from Portugal, which is already in a bailout programme.

Laurence Wormald at SunGard Financial Systems said: "The evidence suggests that action will be needed by Slovenia within the next two, three months. However, a bail-in is likely to be less drastic than the one in Cyprus, since Slovenian banks are much less leveraged than those of Cyprus. Also Slovenia is different from Cyprus in one crucial respect, in that Slovenia has not created a large offshore banking centre."

After Slovenia, who's next? The research house Capital Economics has its money on Malta and Luxembourg.

Slovenia could be next candidate for euro zone bailout | World news | guardian.co.uk

Is Germany too powerful for Europe?

 Stuart Jeffries

Stuart Jeffries The Guardian, Sunday 31 March 2013 19.00 BST

Twenty years ago, Germany's economy was stagnating. Today, as the eurozone crisis deepens, this giant is keeping Europe afloat. But what does it want in return? Stuart Jeffries talks to German sociologist Ulrich Beck, who believes that his country has become a political monster

Anti-German feeling . . . an employee of Cyprus Popular Bank at a protest last month.

Anti-German feeling . . . an employee of Cyprus Popular Bank at a protest last month. Photograph: Yannis Behrakis/Reuters

In his novel Fatherland, Robert Harris envisaged a hellish scenario – Hitler won the second world war. Decades later, the Greater German Reich extends from the Rhine to the Caspian Sea. The rest of Europe, though notionally consisting of independent states, is really under the Nazi jackboot.

Sound familiar? Of course not. That nightmare never came to pass. Happily, Germany does not rule Europe. Or does it? Munich-based sociologist Ulrich Beck argues in his new book that the eurozone catastrophe has given birth to a political monster: a German Europe. When, on 1 July this year, Croatia becomes a member, the European Union will contain 500 million people and be the largest market and trading bloc in the world.

"The new German power in Europe is not based as in former times on force," writes Beck in German Europe. Which is a consolation. "It has no need of weapons to impose its will on other states," he says. "It has no need to invade, and yet is ubiquitous."

His homeland's latest iron chancellor Angela Merkel rules Europe, imposing German values on feebler client nations, bailing out southern Europeans with their oversized public sectors, rampant tax evasion and long lunches. "In the countries most harshly affected by the crisis, many people think they are losers because the austerity policy pursued jointly by Berlin and Brussels deprives them of their means of livelihood – and also of their human dignity," argues Beck.

Other Germans, naturally, don't see it quite that way. The official line from the German embassy in London is that Germany is helping other European economies to become globally competitive and more able to take on emerging markets. "Germany was among the first to have started this endeavour and therefore might temporarily be a little ahead of others," says spokesman Norman Walter. "Our main political drive over the last few years has been to increase competitiveness in all eurozone and EU member states."

To get a different perspective on German domination of Europe, I consult a standup comic: Henning Wehn, a German comedian who is tired of being called an oxymoron by Britons, and is in the middle of a UK tour. The blurb for his show goes: "According to Henning, there's no shortcut to success, hard work will eventually pay off and there is no shame in paying tax." How this transmutes into comedy is anybody's guess, but it seems to suggest that Wehn believes slacker Europe needs a German economics lesson. "Well, economically Germany is mainly dominant because it is the country with most people," says Wehn. "It also has several things that explain its economic success and from which others can learn – our system of apprenticeships, our building societies that help entrepreneurs. When David Cameron spoke about strivers and skivers, that reminded me of a Swabian saying: 'Schaffe, schaffe, Häusle baue!' It means: "Work, work, build your little house!' That sort of striving is deep in German identity."

Economic powerhouse … Frankfurt’s financial district, where the ECB’s HQ is located. Economic powerhouse … Frankfurt’s financial district, where the ECB’s HQ is located. Photograph: Odd Andersen

The worry is that Germany thinks of itself as a nation of strivers bankrolling a continent of skivers. "German money [is being] thrown away on the bankrupt Greeks," ran a headline in the tabloid Bild, while Focus magazine had a cover image of the Venus de Milo giving the finger to the world. "If Ireland and Greece sank into the sea tomorrow, Germany would be quietly relieved," says Simon Winder, publishing director at Penguin and author of Germania: A Personal History of Germans Ancient and Modern. "Germany today reminds me of the British Empire, burdened with non-lucrative colonies that it has to defend when all it's really bothered about is India. The problem for Germany is that it has no India just, as it were, lots of Sierra Leones."

The latest euro crisis over Cyprus bears out Beck's analysis. According to Newsnight's Paul Mason, the Germans want to "avoid creating a moral hazard, rewarding a country that has sold itself as a rule-free playground for Russians who want to keep their money". For German politicians, and not just those of Merkel's ruling Christian Democratic Union, that irresponsible nonsense can't go on for ever: it's time for Cyprus to wake up and smell the austerity. Beck argues that Germany is teaching Cyprus a moral lesson, namely that, as he puts it: "Suffering purifies. The road through hell, the road through austerity, leads to the heaven of economic recovery." It's a very German lesson, borne of the philosophies of Martin Luther and Max Weber and based on the protestant work ethic. That doesn't play too well in Nicosia: hence all those "Merkel – Kaput" banners waved by soon-to-be redundant employees of Cyprus's Popular Bank.

But what are the Germans getting out of teaching allegedly slacker Europeans how to run their economies? For Beck, Germany's European dominance has given the nation a new sense of identity after decades of Nazi guilt, and provides liberation from what he calls the "never again syndrome" – never again a Holocaust, never again fascism, never again militarism. After the second world war and the Holocaust, he argues, Germany was in ruins morally and economically. Now, in both senses, it is back.

The origins of German economic dominance predate our current crisis. More than 20 years ago, Germany made a sacrifice for Europe at Maastricht when it agreed to put the deutschmark to the sword so that another currency could be born. "The tragedy for the Germans is that they viewed the euro as their great, healing gift to the rest of Europe, an act of self-denial in which they cashed in their totemic deutschmark for the continent's greater good," says Winder. Since the fall of Hitler, it has been Germany's self-imposed obligation to help build a Europe where the petty nationalisms that had ruined the continent in two world wars could be definitively overcome.

The prudent housewife … Angela Merkel sits before an EU flag on a visit to a Berlin school, 2011. The prudent housewife … Angela Merkel sits before an EU flag on a visit to a Berlin school, 2011. Photograph: Sean Gallup

It's all about Vergangenheitsbewältigung, which means (roughly) the struggle to come to terms with the past – and, in particular, a Nazi past. (Maybe Britain will some time undergo its own Vergangenheitsbewältigung for its imperial shame, but that's another story.) "The Germans no longer wish to be thought of as racists and warmongers," Beck says. "They would prefer to become the schoolmasters and moral enlighteners of Europe." It's a moot question whether the rest of Europe wants to be on the receiving end of German enlightenment. "Germany's chorus of I-want-to-teach-the-world-to-sing doesn't play too well in Tring or Extramadura," says Winder.

But that's the Teutonic song: two decades ago, Germany after reunification was once as Greece is today, with a stagnating economy and five million unemployed. But, thanks to neoliberal austerity and taking on the Protestant notion that "suffering purifies", the Germans were able to realise a jobs miracle. Now, Beck argues, German reunification is being used as the template for German crisis management in Europe. As head of the continent's strongest economic power, Merkel is in a position to dictate the terms under which struggling eurozone nations can apply for further credit, eroding the democratic autonomy of the Greek, Italian and Spanish parliaments. Beck calls her Merkiavelli – after Machiavelli – to highlight the political nous with which she has run rings around other leaders.

He suggests that she is the uncrowned queen of Europe. Queen Merkiavelli the First of Europe, perhaps, demands that Germany's new colonies save in the interests of stability – a formula based on the good housekeeping practices of a woman who sometimes casts herself as a sensible Swabian housewife. Beck's chancellor sounds like Margaret Thatcher, who also prudently approached the balancing of government accounts as though they were a household budget. "There is one important difference," Beck says. "Thatcher was doing to Britain something the British electorate had voted for. What Merkel is doing to Europe has no democratic mandate."

Viewed thus, Germans are power-crazed anti-democrats using economic crisis to stage a furtive putsch on a supine continent. Aren't we witnessing a German power grab? "Heavens, no. They have no imperial bone left in their body," argues Winder. "They are colonists, but incredibly reluctant ones. There is no smoke-filled room filled with sausage-eating Germans who want to dominate Europe. There is no conspiracy."

"I think that's an incredibly silly point to make," says Wehn. "German dominance in Europe is not anti-democratic. There are parts of Europe that are economically ahead of other parts. It's just the same in Britain: London is economically ahead of the north-east of England. So should London leave sterling? That's obviously a silly answer. The same is true in Europe. There are fishing villages in Greece that are going to be economically negligible, while Germany is dominant. Does that mean we should leave the euro? No! A strong Europe needs a strong Germany."

Cultural export … German comedian Henning Wehn. Cultural export … German comedian Henning Wehn.

There is, though, a paradox in Germany's European domination. It is economically supreme, but culturally negligible. Some of us are enjoying the Wagner bicentenary, but it can hardly be argued that his music indicates the virility of German cultural exports in the new millennium. Nobody is wearing lederhosen in Glasgow or Warsaw. Next to nobody is learning German as a foreign language. Your next box set might well be in Danish but nobody's will be in German. Fatih Akin, Christian Petzold, Hans-Christian Schmid and Ulrich Köhler have one thing in common: few have heard of these alleged icons of German new wave cinema outside Germany. Yes, the Tate's website did crash briefly when it was announced that tickets were available for the Kraftwerk gig at the Turbine Hall, but that's the exception that proves the rule.

"They're living on empty, culturally," says Winder. "There's no German novel I'm looking forward to, and no German film. But it's the same throughout Europe. Europe is culturally null. Britain is the cultural dynamo of Europe by a million miles."

Why is Germany failing to export its cultural goods with the success of, say, its car, machine tool or optics industries? "There's one simple reason," replies Wehn. "Bismarck didn't believe in colonies." What Wehn means by that is that the 19th-century German chancellor, who presided over a vast and recently unified people, decided not to emulate Britain, Spain and France in their imperial land grabs. As a result, German never became a global language; English became the world's most widely spoken tongue. "The English language is dominant because of Hollywood and that helps British culture," says Wehn. In a recent survey by Monocle magazine, Britain was found to be the world's leader in what's called "soft power" – a country's ability to make friends and influence people not through military might but through culture, education, language and values. "In short, the things that make people love us rather than fear us," says John Worne, the British council's director of strategy.

Germany, by contrast, is feared for its economic dominance. At the same time it seems culturally insular. What a shame we don't get more German culture here. After all, the British and Germans are, one world cup and two world wars notwithstanding, simpatico. Germanophile 19th-century historian Thomas Carlyle wrote of Germany "speaking the same old Saxon tongue and thinking in the same old Saxon spirit with ourselves", while George Orwell wrote that during the first world war "the English working class were in contact with foreigners to an extent that is rarely possible. The sole result was that they brought back a hatred of all Europeans, except the Germans, whose courage they admired."

Norman Walter at the German embassy argues that the case for his homeland's cultural nullity is weak. "Well, we're not exactly world champions – but we aren't that bad either." Ingeniously, he quotes back at me a string of Guardian arts stories that seem to suggest German culture thrives here. Last year's gig by heavy-metal band Rammstein in 2012 sold out within minutes and Dave Simpson's five-star review described it as "the rock show of the year". Judith Mackrell argued that Tanztheater Wuppertal's London retrospective World Cities was "revelatory". Similarly, the Economist noted that "British enthusiasm for modern German culture is quietly growing" and that "a new breed of artists is changing British tastes in German culture". And today there's Kurt Schwitters at Tate Britain, Rosemarie Trockel at the Serpentine Gallery. Nobody even mentions the great German art on show at the Northern Renaissance exhibition at the Queen's Gallery, but they really should.

Yes, but visual art and music are the most readily exportable cultural products. Hardly any German literature makes it into the bestseller lists here. In Germany now, the bestseller lists are dominated by Timur Vermes's novel Er is wieder da (He's back), which is about Hitler. The führer awakes in Berlin in the summer of 2011, having fallen asleep in 1945. Hitler becomes a media celebrity before entering politics where he campaigns against dog muck and speeding. The book has sold more than 400,000 copies in Germany, but is as yet untranslated here. A shame: it's a popular account of German Vergangenheitsbewältigung that deserves to be read in Britain. Maybe more Britons should learn German.

And what about German TV? Why, I ask Wehn, are there no German TV series filling BBC4's 9pm Saturday night Euro-drama subtitle-a-rama slot? He contends that we aren't missing much, apart from a cop show called Derrick, which finished broadcasting 15 years ago. But why is there no German rival to Denmark's The Killing, Sweden's Wallander, Italy's Inspector Montalbano or France's Spiral? "In Germany there's no incentive to sell TV content abroad. The BBC makes a lot of money from selling foreign rights, which explains why so much of its content is shown overseas. In Germany, the contracts aren't like that – and the domestic market is huge so there's no incentive."

What does a German Europe mean for the economically bumbling yet allegedly cultural dynamic Britain? "It is drifting into irrelevance," replies Beck. "There is already a two-speed Europe, with a pioneer Europe in the eurozone that the rest of Europe, especially Britain, doesn't really take part in decisions about. Cameron doesn't realise there's a shifting power base in Europe but instead focuses on withdrawal from Europe." Folly, he argues. "Europe isn't across the Channel. For the first time every European citizen existentially depends on Europe." But that too is a German perspective: Britons have rarely gone for continental things such as existentialism, still less a cosmopolitan transcontinental menage.

Unsurprisingly, as a good German committed to the end of petty nationalisms, Beck counsels more powers to the European Union to bring the undemocratic reign of Queen Merkiavelli to an end. In the past, budgetary credits were tied to austerity and neo-liberal reform: in the future, Beck argues, they should be linked to a readiness to support a new, continent-wide social contract set up to defend job security, extend freedom and promote democracy.

Good luck with all that, Professor, I say. "It may well sound hopelessly utopian and naive," he replies, "but why not be utopian and naive? Look at the alternative." Maybe only Germans, thanks to the darkness of their 20th-century past, have such sunny hopes for this benighted continent. It's a different kind of German Europe from the one Beck indicts and one that nobody need fear: not one premised on Teutonic austerity, but filled with a European idealism you get hardly anywhere else on this cynical continent, least of all in Britain.

Is Germany too powerful for Europe? | World news | The Guardian