Monday, September 30, 2013

Canadians on hunger strike in Egyptian jail claim they were beaten

Patrick Kingsley in Cairo The Guardian, Sunday 29 September 2013

John Greyson and Tarek Loubani 'stripped, slapped and accused of being foreign mercenaries' at notorious Tora prison

John Greyson and Tarek Loubani supporters

Supporters of John Greyson and Tarek Loubani call for their release at a protest in Ontario, Canada. Photograph: Mark Spowart/Demotix/Corbis

Two Canadians on hunger strike inside an Egyptian prison have been beaten during their six-week-long detention, the pair have said in statement smuggled out of their jail cell.

Filmmaker John Greyson and medic Tarek Loubani were arrested during disturbances in Cairo on 16 August, and detained without charge ever since. The case has become a cause célèbre in the west with actors Alec Baldwin and Charlize Theron among thousands calling for their release. But little was known about either the circumstances of their arrest or their treatment inside the notorious Tora prison south of Cairo.

Their families said on Sunday Egyptian authorities had extended their detention for another 45 days, Associated Press reported. Cecilia Greyson said a prosecutor issued the extension order for her brother and Loubani.

Lynne Yelich, a Canadian minister responsible for consular affairs, said the government was "disappointed" that the two would stay in custody longer.

In their statement, posted on the website of a friend, Greyson and Loubani said they were arrested after watching a pro-Morsi protest near their hotel that turned into Egypt's fourth state-led massacre since the overthrow of Mohamed Morsi in July. Loubani and Greyson were on their way to Gaza, where they planned to train Palestinian doctors, but had been held up in Cairo because of the political upheaval there.

The pair say that once the shooting started Greyson began to document the massacre, while Loubani treated some of the wounded – and that both witnessed the deaths of around 50 unarmed citizens. They do not say exactly where they were, but it is likely to have been at or near the al-Fath mosque – a building where medics treated injured Morsi supporters, and which later came under siege from soldiers and policemen.

Leaving the site in the evening, the pair say they stopped to ask for directions at a checkpoint. "That's when we were: arrested, searched, caged, questioned, interrogated, videotaped with a 'Syrian terrorist', slapped, beaten, ridiculed, hot-boxed, refused phone calls, stripped, shaved bald, accused of being foreign mercenaries," their 600-word statement said.

"They screamed 'Canadian' as they kicked and hit us. John had a precisely etched bootprint bruise on his back for a week."

After being arrested, Loubani and Greyson said they were taken to Tora prison on the outskirts of Cairo, where they have been held without charge ever since. They were kept for several weeks in a cockroach-infested cell with 36 other people. Now sharing with six other detainees, the pair have been on hunger strike for nearly a fortnight in order to draw attention to their cause.

"We deserve due process, not cockroaches on concrete," their statement ends. "We demand to be released."

Greyson is the director of several feature films and a film professor at a Canadian university, while Loubani is an emergency room doctor who has been spent time in Gaza.

Egypt's prosecutors continue to refuse to say on what charges the pair are being held, and have denied several Guardian requests to interview them in prison. On Sunday their lawyer said authorities had extended the Canadians' detention by another 45 days.

They were among dozens of journalists to be arrested or assaulted in Egypt this summer, as suspicion from Egyptian civilians and officials of foreigners – and in particular foreign media – peaked. Greyson and Loubani are likely to have attracted more suspicion than most because they lacked accreditation from Egypt's press centre, carried video evidence of extreme state wrongdoing, and were on their way to Gaza – a place associated in the minds of many opponents of Mohamed Morsi with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Thousands of Egyptians also remain in jail after a series of arbitrary arrests this summer – many of them uncharged. They include al-Jazeera's Abdullah al-Shami and Mohammed Badr, and Ahmed Abu Deraa, one of the few reporters based in Egypt's lawless Sinai peninsula. Abu Deraa faces a military trial for reporting on alleged army abuses in its counter-insurgency campaign in the region.

Canadians on hunger strike in Egyptian jail claim they were beaten | World news | The Guardian

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Egypt urges global support for crackdown on Muslim Brotherhood 'terrorism'

 

Egypt's army-backed government has pleaded for support for its crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood, warning that the world must not justify "terrorism".

Foreign minister Nabil Fahmy made his appeal in a speech at the annual United Nations General Assembly on Saturday as hundreds of flag-waving protesters staged a noisy rally against him outside the global body's headquarters.

Mr Fahmy said that Egyptians "have the right" to carry out a political roadmap announced after the July 3 ouster of elected president Mohammed Morsi and urged "non-interference" from the outside world.

"I trust that the international community, which has long rejected terrorism, will firmly stand by the Egyptian people in the fight against violence and its advocates, and will not accept any attempt to justify it, or tolerate it," he said.

Egypt has been wracked by violence since the army ousted Morsi, an Islamist who was Egypt's first elected leader.

Police have arrested more than 2,000 Islamists in a broad crackdown on Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood movement.

More than 1,000 people, mostly Islamists, have also died in clashes with security forces since August 14, when police broke up two Islamist protest camps in Cairo.

Since the bloody crackdown, Islamists have lashed out at the Coptic Christians with a series of church attacks, accusing the minority of backing the military.

In his speech, Mr Fahmy condemned "hideous acts of terrorism" that "aim at undermining the democratic process and destroying our economy".

The army-installed government has drafted a roadmap that calls for new elections in 2014.

Egypt's crackdown has been widely criticised by Western nations, but has won support from several regional governments wary of the Arab Spring protests.

The United States has stopped short of cutting its $1.55 billion in annual military and economic aid to Egypt.

AFP

Egypt urges global support for crackdown on Muslim Brotherhood 'terrorism' - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Saturday, September 28, 2013

From Home Counties prom queen to world's most wanted woman

How the 'White Widow' was obsessed with Islam even as a schoolgirl

By Paul Bracchi and Rebecca Evans

PUBLISHED: 21:22 GMT, 27 September 2013 | UPDATED: 07:57 GMT, 28 September 2013

  • 'White Widow' is wanted by Interpol for terrorist activity across Africa
  • Samantha Lewthwaite from Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire is suspected of playing part in Nairobi mall massacre
  • Photographs reveal the many safehouses police suspect she lived in with children
  • Childhood friend reveals how Samantha Lewthwaite went from 'fading into the background' to giving talks and advice on being a Muslim as a teenager

Samantha Lewthwaite was attending the end-of-year ball at her school in Aylesbury.

She dazzled, by all accounts, in a pink silk ballgown set off by a diamante tiara and matching gold earrings and necklace. ‘She looked fantastic that night,’ recalled one admirer.

The date was 2001. It was possibly the last time she received such a compliment. Shortly afterwards, at the age of 17, she converted to Islam and began wearing a jilbab, the long flowing robe that covers everything but the hands and face.

This is the story of what happened to her; how, in the space of little more than a decade, the glamorous young lady you see in the photograph became the world’s most wanted female terrorist, a chain of events that culminated in the Nairobi massacre where more than 60 civilians lost their lives.

We still do not know if Lewthwaite, 29, was the ‘white woman’ survivors say they saw with an AK-47 in one hand and a grenade in the other, or if she is among the dead hostage-takers.

British security officials have yet to receive confirmation from the Kenyan authorities of her role in the attack.

This week, Interpol issued an international arrest warrant, flagged with a high-priority ‘Red Notice’, for her in connection with a string of other terrorist outrages over the past two years across the Horn of Africa, where she is known as the ‘white sister’ or the ‘White Widow’.

What is indisputable is that she has blood on her hands. Lewthwaite, who was married to one of the 7/7 bombers, has already been identified as a main recruiter for Al Qaeda in East Africa and is an official spokesman for Al Shabaab, the terror group behind the Nairobi atrocity.

In the wake of 7/7, when her husband Jermaine Lindsay blew himself up along with 26 passengers on a Tube train near King’s Cross Station in London in 2005, she portrayed herself as another victim of the tragedy. ‘Abhorrent,’ she called it.

She had no knowledge, she said, of his murderous plans, and dreaded the day she would have to tell her own children ‘what their father did’.

How cynically empty these protestations of innocence seem now. For our inquiries in her home town of Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire over the past week suggest the marriage of Samantha and Jermaine three years earlier was a union of two already poisoned minds.

Samantha Lewthwaite, aged 16-17 years at school. Lewthwaite went on to convert to Islam and marry one of the 7/7 suicide bombers Samantha Lewthwaite, aged 16-17 years at school. Lewthwaite went on to convert to Islam and marry one of the 7/7 suicide bombers

 

Samantha Lewthwaite, aged 16-17 years at school. Lewthwaite went on to convert to Islam and marry one of the 7/7 suicide bombers

Later, in the wake of 7/7, she even tried to radicalise her own family.

According to neighbours, her mother, from Irish Catholic stock, has been seen wearing a hijab — an Islamic scarf covering the head.

Yet, Samantha Lewthwaite’s upbringing, at least to begin with, could not have been a less likely breeding ground for anti-Western extremism.

More...

She was born in 1983, the youngest of three children, in Banbridge, County Down. It says on her birth certificate that her father was a lorry driver.

He is also a former soldier, who served in Northern Ireland during the Seventies at the height of the Troubles. His regiment, the 9/12 Royal Lancers, was stationed in Omagh, close to the scene where the Real IRA slaughtered 29 people in 1998.

Lewthwaite, who came form second generation Irish-Catholic stock, married and Jamaican-born carpet fitter Lindsay Jermain when she was just 18

Lewthwaite, who came form second generation Irish-Catholic stock, married and Jamaican-born carpet fitter Lindsay Jermain when she was just 18

Could there be a more chilling betrayal of the family’s proud military past (Samantha Lewthwaite’s paternal grandfather was also in the Armed Forces) than the revelations emerging from Kenya about the ‘White Widow’ and her hate-filled Al Shabaab associates?

The Lewthwaites moved from Northern Ireland to Buckinghamshire in the early Nineties.

Aylesbury has a small but thriving Muslim community; the house where the young Samantha grew up was just half a mile from the mosque.

When she was 11, her parents split up, an event that left her devastated. In the aftermath, it seems she was drawn to the strong family ethic of the Muslims who lived around her.

Childhood friends remembered how she spent a couple of summers when she was 11 and 12 ‘hanging around’ with a mixed group of Muslim and white youngsters in the town’s Alfred Rose Memorial Park.

It was here that she developed a crush on a Muslim boy, three or four years older than her. Her feelings were not reciprocated.

‘She lived in an area with a lot of Muslims. I think that really influenced her,’ said a friend who knew her throughout her teenage years at the nearby Grange secondary school and into adulthood.

These early experiences developed into an obsession with Islam, an obsession that was witnessed first hand by that friend, who was also white and had a Muslim boyfriend.

That young woman became pregnant by him when she was 17, and they had a second child four years later. Her boyfriend later served time in prison. The two are no longer together and she spoke to the Mail on condition of anonymity.

The friend revealed how she and Samantha Lewthwaite attended gatherings where Muslim preachers would warn them to ‘stay away from kufars’ (non-Muslims).

‘She was always much better than me at learning Arabic and reciting the surahs [chapters of the Koran],’ said the friend.

The Aylesbury home of Andrew Lewthwaite, her father who served in Northern Ireland during the Seventies

The Aylesbury home of Andrew Lewthwaite, her father who served in Northern Ireland during the Seventies

‘She was really good at all the learning. Samantha was never embarrassed about anything like I was. If we were in the middle of town, she would just get on her knees and start praying. She was never into drugs or alcohol or anything like that, so she slipped into the Islamic way of doing things very easily.

‘At school, she had always faded into the background, but suddenly she started to take the lead and would organise talks about being a Muslim and give a lot of advice.’

When the friend converted to Islam, Lewthwaite quickly followed suit. ‘I think I influenced her,’ said the young woman, who is no longer a Muslim. ‘I was never a good Muslim. I only converted because I fell in love with a Muslim. It was different for Samantha. She got much more involved.’

Of the 2.7 million Muslims in Britain, an estimated 78,000 are converts, and about a third of that total are white women.

Not long after Lewthwaite’s conversion, in September, 2002 — a year after the 9/11 attacks in New York — she  enrolled on a degree course in politics and religions at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London.

She dropped out after two months.

Terrified shoppers emerge out of the mall in Kenya

The 'White Widow' enrolled on a degree course in politics and religions at the School of Oriental and African Studies in 2002 but dropped out after only two months

The 'White Widow' enrolled on a degree course in politics and religions at the School of Oriental and African Studies in 2002 but dropped out after only two months

Samantha Lewthwaite and Lindsay Jermaine married against her family's wishes in 2002 just weeks after meeting

Samantha Lewthwaite and Lindsay Jermaine married against her family's wishes in 2002 just weeks after meeting

A university spokesman said it is unlikely ‘that her time here had any influence on her beliefs’.  But SOAS has attracted controversy for giving a platform to Islamic extremists and, like many campuses in Britain, it is seen as a fertile recruiting ground for Islamic groups such as Hizb ut-Tahrir (HuT), which encourages the radicalisation of young Muslims and has acted as a conduit  to more hardline organisations.

Of the 126 people convicted of terrorist activity in Britain between 1999 and 2009, more than a quarter had studied at a British university, according to a recent study. 

Lewthwaite will now be added to that statistic, no matter how fleeting her time at SOAS.

It was during this time, in fact, that she met Jermaine Lindsay online, in an Islamic chatroom. The couple progressed to speaking on the phone and exchanging photographs.

They met face-to-face for the first time at a Stop The War march in London in 2002. Just weeks later, in October, the two were married by a Muslim elder. They adopted the names Asmantara and Jamal.

A childhood friend said Lewthwaite was never shy or embarassed about her conversion to Islam and prayed in the middle of the street in Aylesbury as a teenager

A childhood friend said Lewthwaite was never shy or embarassed about her conversion to Islam and prayed in the middle of the street in Aylesbury as a teenager

His West Indian mother was a Muslim. In fact, both she and her son had converted to Islam together; he was 15 when he converted and 17 when he married.

His 18-year-old bride, on the other hand, was not from such a background. Her own father, in particular, strongly disapproved of the relationship. None of her family was present at the wedding.

What conclusions can be drawn from this? Simply that we cannot assume it was Lindsay who radicalised Lewthwaite. She was every bit as fanatical as him when they began their relationship.

The couple rented a house in Aylesbury. Their first son was born in 2004 and took his father’s Islamic name: Abdullah Jamal.

There is at least one other significant event in Samantha Lewthwaite’s ‘British’ CV.

This property in Nyali, Mombasa is one of the locations Kenyan police suspect Samantha Lewthwaite has used as a safe house

This property in Nyali, Mombasa is one of the locations Kenyan police suspect Samantha Lewthwaite has used as a safe house

Samantha Lewthwaite was believed to have signed a rental agreement for this house in Mayfair, Johannesburg, which has been demolished

Samantha Lewthwaite was believed to have signed a rental agreement for this house in Mayfair, Johannesburg, which has been demolished

Less than six months after their son was born, Lewthwaite and Lindsay — or Asmantara and Jamal as they were now known — visited Dewsbury in West Yorkshire, where they met Mohammad Sidique Khan, the ringleader of the 7/7 bombers.

Did Lewthwaite also learn bomb-making skills from Khan?

That possibility is a very real one. Kenyan police found bomb-making equipment similar to that used by Khan and his 7/7 co-conspirators, when they raided a property in Mombasa, in 2011.

The same property had been used as a safe house by Lewthwaite while on the run.

It was six days after the 7/7 attacks in London that more than 50 police — some armed and wearing bulletprooof vests — raided Lewthwaite’s red-brick semi-detached home where she had been living with Lindsay.

Lewthwaite, pregnant with their second child, was led ‘screaming’ from the property.

The only items remaining in a house believed to have been occupied by Samantha Lewthwaite, who was living in Kenya on a fake South African passport

The only items remaining in a house in Nyali, Kenya, believed to have been occupied by Samantha Lewthwaite, who was living in Kenya on a fake South African passport

A gated house in the Ranburg area of Johannesburg where Samantha Lewthwaite is believed to have hidden from police

A gated house in the Ranburg area of Johannesburg where Samantha Lewthwaite is believed to have hidden from police

Another house in Kwale, Kenya, believed to have been used by the woman who is wanted by Interpol in relation to terrorist activity

Another house in Kwale, Kenya, believed to have been used by the woman who is wanted by Interpol in relation to terrorist activity

Another residence in Bakarani, Kenya (left) is a suspected safe house of the woman who is on the run Yet another safehouse believed to have been used by Lewthwaite in Bakarani, Kenya

Houses in Bakarani, Kenya, where police suspect Lewthwaite was hiding before the Nairobi mall massacre

Shortly afterwards, the house was torched in an arson attack. Police believed her story that she had no knowledge of the terrible events involving her husband and placed her in a safe house.

She later moved to a flat in the Elmhurst area of the town, where she lived between 2005 and 2009.

‘Sam had two young children and towards the end she was pregnant with a third,’ said a young woman, herself a Muslim convert, who lived opposite her. The identity of the father of the third child is unknown.

‘She moved out just after she had the third baby in 2009. She didn’t say she was leaving. She was a very private person, but you could always hear the children screaming and she would scream back. She did not seem to have any affection for them at all.’

Almost three years after leaving Aylesbury, Lewthwaite surfaced in Kenya.

In December 2011, it emerged that Kenyan police were hunting her, by now the mother of a fourth child, over a plot to blow up hotels and shopping centres in Mombasa.

‘I would be shocked if Samantha was actually inside the Nairobi mall because I don’t think she would risk getting killed and leaving her children without any parents,’ said the friend who grew up with her in Aylesbury.

But while she may not be willing to sacrifice her own children for her all-consuming faith, how many other children have the White Widow and her accomplices killed or left orphaned?

Qatar under pressure over migrant labour abuse

Robert Booth, Owen Gibson and Pete Pattisson in Kathmandu

The Guardian, Friday 27 September 2013

International Trade Union Confederation says death toll could reach 600 a year unless government makes urgent reforms

Asian workers cleaning the stadium at the end of the 2011 Asian Cup semi-final

Asian workers cleaning the stadium at the end of the 2011 Asian Cup semi-final football match between Australia and Uzbekistan in the Qatari capital Doha. Qatar is under pressure over the deaths of workers preparing for the 2022 World Cup. Photograph: Yasser Al-Zayyat/AFP/Getty Images

Qatar is facing growing international pressure to act against the growing death toll of migrant workers preparing for the 2022 World Cup as unions warned another 4,000 people could die in the Gulf emirate before a ball is kicked.

The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) said at least half a million extra workers from countries including Nepal, India and Sri Lanka were expected to flood in to Qatar to complete stadiums, hotels and infrastructure. Unless the Doha government made urgent reforms to working conditions the death toll among migrant builders could reach 600 a year, or almost a dozen a week, the ITUC said.

The stark warning came after a Guardian investigation revealed that 44 Nepalese workers died from 4 June to 8 August this year, about half from heart failure or workplace accidents. Workers described being forced to work in 50C heat without a supply of drinking water by employers who withhold salaries for several months and retain their passports to prevent them leaving the country. The investigation found sickness is endemic among workers living in overcrowded and insanitary conditions, and hunger has been reported.

A representative on the board of Fifa, which controversially awarded the world's biggest sporting event to Qatar in 2010, called for an urgent inquiry by the world governing body. Fifa announced it will discuss the issue at a meeting of its executive committee in Zurich next week and a spokesman said it was "very concerned about the reports presented by the media regarding labour rights' abuses and the conditions for construction workers".

A spokesman for Qatar's World Cup organisers said they were "appalled" by the Guardian revelations and said there was "no excuse" for the maltreatment of workers. In London, Tory MP Damian Collins said England and other major footballing nations should consider boycotting the World Cup if Fifa does not show it is taking concerns surrounding the Qatar 2022 tournament seriously.

The problem of workers' deaths is not confined to Nepalese migrants who make up 16% of Qatar's 1.2 million migrant labour force. The Indian ambassador in Qatar said 82 Indian workers died in the first five months of this year and 1,460 complained to the embassy about labour conditions and consular problems. More than 700 Indian workers died in Qatar between 2010 and 2012.

"Nothing of any substance is being done by the Qatar authorities on this issue," said Sharan Burrow, the general secretary of the Brussels-based ITUC. It has met the Qatari labour minister in Geneva and officials at the Qatar 2022 supreme committee. "The evidence-based assessment of the mortality rate of migrant workers in Qatar shows that at least one worker on average per day is dying. In the absence of real measures to tackle that and an increase in 50% of the migrant workforce, there will be a concominant increase in deaths."

The ITUC has based the estimate on current mortality figures for Nepalese and Indian workers who form a large part of Qatar's migrant workforce, the majority of whom are builders. While it admits that the cause of death is not clear for many of the deceased – with autopsies often not being conducted and routine attribution to heart failure – it believes harsh and dangerous conditions at work and cramped and squalid living quarters are to blame.

"We are absolutely convinced they are dying because of conditions of work and life," said Burrow. "Everything the Guardian has found out accords with the information we have gathered from visits to Qatar and Nepal … The 2022 World Cup is a very high-profile event and should be implemented with the very highest standards and that is clearly not the case."

The Nepalese government on Thursday recalled its ambassador to Qatar after she caused a series of diplomatic incidents, which drew complaints from both the Nepali and Qatari authorities.

In an interview with the BBC earlier this year, ambassador Maya Kumari Sharma said Qatar was an "open jail" for Nepalese migrants. Her post had been under threat for some time. According to local media reports, earlier this week a senior Nepali politician called for her dismissal, following a request from the Qatari ambassador to Nepal.

There were wider calls in Kathmandu for Nepal's government to do more to defend its people working in the Gulf.

"What we now want to see is an increase in human capacity at Nepal's embassy in Qatar to deal with the huge numbers of workers seeking help, and an increase in resources so that the embassy can provide shelter, food and, if necessary, air tickets back to Nepal," said Rameshwar Nepal, director of Amnesty International Nepal.

Last month 30 migrant workers took refuge in the embassy.

Qatar under pressure over migrant labour abuse | Global development | The Guardian

Friday, September 27, 2013

At 16, Ganesh got a job in Qatar. Two months later he was dead

 pete pattison

Pete Pattisson in Kathmandu and Doha

The Guardian, Thursday 26 September 2013

Nepalese workers go to Qatar to find a way out of poverty. Instead, many are trapped into 12-hour days and nights in overcrowded, filthy camps. Some never make it home alive

coffins-kathmandu-airport

The coffins of two Nepalese workers killed in Qatar, at Kathmandu airport before delivery to their families. Photograph: Peter Pattisson/guardian.co.uk

Amid the urgent bustle of Kathmandu airport, you can see one of globalisation's most bitter sights. At the departure gate, hopeful parents bid tearful farewells to their garlanded sons as they join the hundreds of thousands of Nepalese heading overseas for work. At the other end of the terminal, among the stream of passengers emerging through arrivals, the coffins of migrant workers are wheeled out on luggage trolleys to be collected by families. Some relatives are stoic, others wail and writhe on the floor. On average, three or four bodies arrive home every day.

These are the big losers of scandalous abuse and exploitation of some of the poorest, most disenfranchised people on the planet: the workers who leave Nepal for the Middle East every year.

Ganesh Bishwakarma was one such worker. For Ganesh, Qatar was an oasis in the desert, a promised land where he could work his way out of the acute poverty that had trapped his family in Nepal's rural Dang district for generations. Like many others in his village he had met the recruitment agents who promised well paid work and the opportunity to provide for his family. He left pledging to come back and build his mother a beautiful house.

He did return – after only two months and in a coffin. He was 16.

"We didn't think he would die like this," said his grandmother, Motikala. "We didn't think we would be crying like this."

It was late at night when the ambulance carrying Ganesh's body pulled up outside his family's small mud house. The wailing of his friends and neighbours started long before his coffin was unloaded and carried back home by his shocked and grieving family. All night his family crouched around the child's coffin. As dawn broke, they said their final farewells and lit his funeral pyre.

At 16, Ganesh was too young to have legally migrated for work, but that did not stop a local recruitment broker arranging a fake passport stating he was 20. The broker charged an extortionate fee for a cleaning job in Qatar – far in excess of the legal limit set by the Nepalese government – leaving the boy and his family with a 150,000-rupee (£940) recruitment debt that he promised to pay back at an interest rate of 36%.

Every year, almost 400,000 Nepalese men and women leave their towns and villages for jobs overseas. More than 100,000 head to Qatar, where a booming construction industry and insatiable appetite for cheap labour has been fuelled by its successful bid to host the 2022 World Cup, celebrated by the Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani and his wife, pictured below. Yet instead of the salaries and prospects they have been promised, many of these workers are led into a web of exploitation, corruption and deceit and, increasingly, slavery and death.

For many of these migrants, their fate is sealed before they have left Nepal. "[Nepalese migrant workers] go without asking questions," said Nilambar Badal, director of the Migrants' Centre in Nepal, which advises migrants of the risks of working overseas. "And so every penny is extracted from them."

While construction of the stadiums is yet to start, Qatar is already a giant building site as it prepares for the World Cup. Construction sites can range from vast chasms crawling with thousands of workers, to a handful of men building a villa. What doesn't change is the relentless heat and humidity. Workers on most sites toil away in pale blue boilersuits stained dark by their sweat. They wrap themselves up, even draping their faces in cloth to shield them from the sun. Often only their eyes are visible.

Ten miles from the centre of Doha, workers are toiling under a searing sun on the Lusail City development. By 2022, this huge building site will be Qatar's gleaming new metropolis and a centrepiece of Qatar's World Cup tournament. Yet there is mounting evidence to suggest it is being built in part on the forced labour of men who find themselves powerless to leave – their wages retained to stop them running away, their passports confiscated and deprived of the ID cards they need to move around freely without fear of arrest.

Map: Qatar stadiums

Some workers at Lusail City say they have not been paid for months and can only watch as the interest mounts on their debts in Nepal. One group finally took strike action to demand their wages, a drastic step given that the authorities can simply expel them to penury and shame back at home for the most minor infraction.

"The situation has become so bad that we have had to go on strike three or four times to demand our salary," said SBD, a Nepalese migrant who works on Lusail's marina. "Once we stole the keys from the buses which take us to work so they could not force us to go. We've gone to the police, but they refused to help us."

An hour's drive away, a vast dusty industrial zone west of Doha is home to tens of thousands of migrant workers. Temperatures can reach up to 50C, with labourers working up to 12 hours a day, yet the men who have been put to work for a sub-contractor claim they are not supplied with drinking water.

At night they return to filthy and overcrowded accommodation in the Sanaya industrial centre, where the stench of raw sewage is overpowering and workers allege 600 men share two kitchens. "The kitchens are infested with mosquitoes, cockroaches and bugs," said KBB, one of the camp's residents. "Flies are sitting on the food. People are getting sick."

The appalling toll on migrant labourers building the infrastructure for the World Cup is reflected right across Qatar's construction sector.

In a tiny room behind the Nepalese embassy, the Guardian found dozens of migrant workers seeking rescue and redress from their employers. "When my two-year contract finished, I asked my employer to let me go home. He kept promising to issue me with an exit permit and send me home, but he never did," said Bir Bahadur Lama, 25, who has been trying to return to Nepal for a year. "Last year my employer sold me to another man, but when he realised I was an undocumented worker, he fired me. My only option now is to turn myself in to the police, and hope that they'll deport me."

One large group sought refuge after their employer had allegedly paid no wages for months at a time. They said he was now refusing to issue the exit permits they needed to return home.

"We do not want to leave our money behind, but we are risking our lives by staying here. It is not worth it," said Ramesh Kumar Bishwakarma, 32, who has not been paid for 10 months. "Just give us a ticket and our passports. We want to leave as fast as possible."

For an increasing number of migrants, their only way out of Qatar is in a coffin. Mortality rates among Nepalese workers have risen over the past few years. Nepal's foreign employment promotion board (FEPB) estimates that 726 migrants died overseas in 2012, an 11% increase on the previous year.

Migrant rights group Pravasi Nepali Co-ordination Committee (PNCC) said the real number of deaths was likely to be double this as the FEPB's figures include only those where a relative claimed compensation or insurance money. It put the death toll closer to 1,300. "The number of deaths among Nepalese migrants is much higher than other south Asian countries," said Mahendra Pandey, the chair of PNCC. "Most Nepalese work in construction, but they are not experienced at this type of work, which is much more risky than other jobs. They also often find they are not being paid a good salary which led some to commit suicide."

The most common cause of death given on forms is some form of heart failure. There is confusion over why so many apparently healthy young men are dying of cardiac arrest – so much so that these deaths are now commonly referred to as "sudden death syndrome".

"These workers who are dying are young, but heart attacks are not a common cause of death among young people," said Dr Prakash Raj Regmi, president of the Nepal Heart Foundation, who points to the appalling working and living conditions these workers endure as a possible cause, saying: "These men have poor eating habits, high levels of mental stress and work long hours in extreme conditions."

Ganesh's family was told the boy died of a cardiac arrest weeks after he arrived in Qatar. It is something the family finds hard to accept. "This son of mine was strong. He didn't even have a cough," said his father, Tilak Bahadur. "He went abroad and died unexpectedly. Was it the climate or something else?"

ganesh-bishwakarma Tilak Bahadur Bishwakarma holds a photo of his son, Ganesh, 16, who died in Qatar from a cardiac arrest, six weeks after leaving Nepal. Photograph: Peter Pattisson/guardian.co.uk

The Nepalese government seems unwilling to act against mounting evidence of the labour abuses faced by thousands of its citizens. It blames the recruitment agencies, which it accuses of conning vulnerable workers into bogus contracts and inflated recruitment fees.

"We know about these problems, and we have taken certain measures against the responsible agencies," said Divas Acharya, director of the department of foreign employment in Nepal. "We are trying to do more, but we are short of staff and resources."

For Ganesh's family, the hope they felt two months ago as their boy left for Qatar has turned into uncertainty and despair. As the flames from the funeral pyre started to die down, his father's thoughts turned to the debt that Ganesh had left behind. Despite his son's hopes of returning home a rich man, the family never received a rupee from Qatar.

"I don't know how I am going to pay back the loan we took out to pay for my son's job. It is on my mind the whole time. I know the lender won't spare me," he said. "I don't ever want to hear the name of Qatar again."

From safety to serfdom

For most of the thousands of migrant workers who flock to the Middle East, their problems originate at home, with unscrupulous recruitment agents who often impose high fees for finding them a job and make false promises about salaries and contract terms.

The more ruthless will fake documents, including health certificates, to make their "clients" seem fitter for work than they really are. The poorer migrants will usually have to borrow money – often at steep rates – from moneylenders or other people in their village to pay their way.

Once in Qatar, the kafala system binds the worker to a single employer. Workers have little scope to complain about malpractice, such as confiscation of passport, late payment of wages and failure to issue ID cards, because the employer knows his labourers depend on him. Kafala requires employers to report workers who quit without permission for "absconding", an offence leading to their detention and deportation. It also requires workers to secure exit permits from their employer before they can go abroad.

"We can't run away and we can't change company," said an electrician working at the new international airport. "If we run away the police may catch us – we are afraid of them. We will become illegal."

According to the International Labour Organisation, forced labour is "all work which is exacted from someone under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily".

The ILO's checklist specifies a range of conditions that are the hallmarks of forced labour. The Nepalese allegations tick many of these boxes, including physical violence, exclusion from community, removal of rights and privileges, worsening of working conditions, the withholding of wages, retention of identity documents, and induced indebtedness.

Human Rights Watch said: "The sponsorship law prohibits migrant workers from changing jobs without their employer's consent; even when employers fail to pay competitive wages, provide decent conditions, or meet the conditions of the employment contract, workers cannot simply change jobs."

At 16, Ganesh got a job in Qatar. Two months later he was dead | Global development | The Guardian

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Brazilian president Rousseff: US surveillance a 'breach of international law'

Julian Borger New York The Guardian, Wednesday 25 September 2013

Dilma Rousseff's scathing speech to UN general assembly the most serious diplomatic fallout over revelations of US spying

Dilma Rousseff UN general assembly

Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff speaks at the United Nations general assembly. Photograph: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Brazil's president, Dilma Rousseff, has launched a blistering attack on US espionage at the UN general assembly, accusing the NSA of violating international law by its indiscriminate collection of personal information of Brazilian citizens and economic espionage targeted on the country's strategic industries.

Rousseff's angry speech was a direct challenge to President Barack Obama, who was waiting in the wings to deliver his own address to the UN general assembly, and represented the most serious diplomatic fallout to date from the revelations by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

Rousseff had already put off a planned visit to Washington in protest at US spying, after NSA documents leaked by Snowden revealed that the US electronic eavesdropping agency had monitored the Brazilian president's phone calls, as well as Brazilian embassies and spied on the state oil corporation, Petrobras.

"Personal data of citizens was intercepted indiscriminately. Corporate information – often of high economic and even strategic value – was at the centre of espionage activity.

"Also, Brazilian diplomatic missions, among them the permanent mission to the UN and the office of the president of the republic itself, had their communications intercepted," Rousseff said, in a global rallying cry against what she portrayed as the overweening power of the US security apparatus.

"Tampering in such a manner in the affairs of other countries is a breach of international law and is an affront of the principles that must guide the relations among them, especially among friendly nations. A sovereign nation can never establish itself to the detriment of another sovereign nation. The right to safety of citizens of one country can never be guaranteed by violating fundamental human rights of citizens of another country."

Washington's efforts to smooth over Brazilian outrage over NSA espionage have so far been rebuffed by Rousseff, who has proposed that Brazil build its own internet infrastructure.

"Friendly governments and societies that seek to build a true strategic partnership, as in our case, cannot allow recurring illegal actions to take place as if they were normal. They are unacceptable," she said.

"The arguments that the illegal interception of information and data aims at protecting nations against terrorism cannot be sustained. Brazil, Mr President, knows how to protect itself. We reject, fight and do not harbour terrorist groups," Rousseff said.

"As many other Latin Americans, I fought against authoritarianism and censorship and I cannot but defend, in an uncompromising fashion, the right to privacy of individuals and the sovereignty of my country," the Brazilian president said. She was imprisoned and tortured for her role in a guerilla movement opposed to Brazil's military dictatorship in the 1970s.

"In the absence of the right to privacy, there can be no true freedom of expression and opinion, and therefore no effective democracy. In the absence of the respect for sovereignty, there is no basis for the relationship among nations."

Rousseff called on the UN oversee a new global legal system to govern the internet. She said such multilateral mechanisms should guarantee the "freedom of expression, privacy of the individual and respect for human rights" and the "neutrality of the network, guided only by technical and ethical criteria, rendering it inadmissible to restrict it for political, commercial, religious or any other purposes.

"The time is ripe to create the conditions to prevent cyberspace from being used as a weapon of war, through espionage, sabotage and attacks against systems and infrastructure of other countries," the Brazilian president said.

As host to the UN headquarters, the US has been attacked from the general assembly many times in the past, but what made Rousseff's denunciation all the more painful diplomatically was the fact that it was delivered on behalf of large, increasingly powerful and historically friendly state.

Obama, who followed Rousseff to the UN podium, acknowledged
international alarm at the scale of NSA snooping revealed by Snowden.
He said: "Just as we reviewed how we deploy our extraordinary military
capabilities in a way that lives up to our ideals, we have begun to
review the way that we gather intelligence, so as to properly balance
the legitimate security concerns of our citizens and allies, with the
privacy concerns that all people share."

Brazilian officials said that Washington had told them about this
review but had noted that its results would not be known for months
and that Rousseff believed it was urgent to raise the need for an
international code of ethics for electronic espionage.

Rousseff will leave New York tomorrow without meeting Obama but
Brazil's new foreign minister, Luiz Alberto Figueiredo, will remain at
the UN throughout the week and will meet his opposite number, John
Kerry, Brazilian officials said, in an attempt to start mending the
rift between the two countries.

Brazilian president Rousseff: US surveillance a 'breach of international law' | World news | The Guardian

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Liberal defenders of the veil have lost their way

 

Yasmin Alibhai Brown Sunday 22 September 2013

When faces are hidden those tiny, vital facial signs of human contact and mutuality go missing

Round two of the veil debate. I would prefer not to get into the ring again but must, not because I’m a stubborn mule, but because so much is at stake. Sorry to those Muslim friends and foes who think we should not talk about the veil, that it distracts from “real issues”, is an excuse to attack Muslims, an encouragement to racists, an infringement of personal freedom, whipping up hysteria over “just clothes, only worn by a minority”, something which is not the business of non-Muslims and part of a sinister secularist manifesto and so on.

They are either frighteningly complacent or in denial, so too are white, black and brown liberals on the left. Were their own daughters to take up the niqab, would they cheerfully accept the decision? Like hell they would. Some good friends and individuals I deeply respect defend the choice as a fundamental liberty. But if accepting and symbolising female inferiority and menace is a freedom, we liberals, human rights activists and anti-racists have really have lost our maps and sense of direction.

I wrote to The Guardian objecting to a long feature on niqabs which left out Muslim women who are against veiling, the silenced majority, victims of liberal censorship. At a spontaneous, “private” meeting I attended, I was screamed at by people whose socialist and egalitarian principles are mine too. Muslims were present, several furious. Apparently I am a self-loathing or fake Muslim, friend of the EDL, an ignoramus, a prostitute of a white man (my husband, an antiracist), a sell out. Later a few attendees, including gentle Muslim men and women, apologised for the way their comrades behaved. But they never spoke up. I hear out there on the web some really nasty stuff has been circulating about my anti-veil views.

I will now quote a letter from my friend Suhayl Saadi, a Muslim Pakistani GP and fine novelist from Glasgow. “Saudi Arabia is the worst thing that has happened to Muslim societies since the Black have furthered the coalition between the Al Saud family and Sunni theocracy of the Arabian peninsula... Our political classes seem pathologically leveraged into the interests of the Saudi regime. Nice white liberals who do not want to tarnish their supposedly inclusive credentials do us no favours by politely helping us into ever deeper pits of ghettoisation... This is not about consumer ‘choice’, we are not talking here of brands of tiles or toilet rolls. The Left in Muslim countries is under no such illusions and its members are regularly murdered by Islamicist paramilitary ( often state sponsored) death squads operating like the Contras in South America.” He calls for “guilty” white liberals and all those on the left, including Muslims, to confront this spreading evil.

A few years ago, I was sent a list by a teacher who worked for a strict Islamic, Saudi-backed school in England. She left because they were forcing her to wear the cloak and hijab and were bringing in the face veil too. ( Note: she, a practising Muslim from a liberal branch of Islam had no right to choose what she wore when teaching.) The list for students and parents was of the reasons they were to give for the veil. Those were as follows: choice, religion, spirituality, freedom, tradition. How many times did you hear these repeated last week by niqab wearers and their friends? Parents of tiny girls with headscarves  tell me they are training them to cover themselves. Informed choice is one thing, but trained choice? Or a choice where females know they will be ostracised if they don’t comply? This never happened before, not in the west, nor in most of the east. Now it is spreading far and fast. Iranian women don’t cover faces but must wear scarves; In Arab countries women are attacked for not conforming with imposed rules. Here the compulsion can be internal or external.

The social cost is never considered by upholders of this custom. It is hard enough to keep this multifarious nation together. Racism, suspicion and antagonism lurk in every corner and to stop things from falling apart we need trust and binding ties. When faces are hidden, what goes missing are those tiny, vital, facial signs of human contact and undeclared mutuality. The covering declares self-segregation emphatically and it unsettles and provokes people. For those forced into shrouds, there is only night. They could be victims of abuse and miserable but we would never know. Some prominent Muslim women insist the garment is not enforced. They have no evidence to back these assertions partly because  it would be impossible to gather. The same would apply to Hassidic women – none would ever admit being oppressed.

Bans are unwise. But this practice cannot be just a private matter. If we are allowed to worry publicly about slutty clothes worn by females, why not clothes that make females invisible? The government must now issue guidelines which specify that faces must be shown in schools, hospitals, courts, airports, police stations, driving test centres etc. Schools and hospitals must also be empowered to set their own, reasonable rules on acceptable dress codes. These rules already exist and should be extended to all communities, including Muslims. After all they are British citizens too.

Liberal defenders of the veil have lost their way - Comment - Voices - The Independent

Monday, September 23, 2013

What is Al Shabaab and what are the Al Qaeda-linked terrorist group's motives?

 

Video: Kenya attack prompts fears Al Shabaab is on the rise (Photo: AFP) (ABC News)

Somali men carry weapons during an demonstration organised by Al-Shabaab

Photo: Somali men carry weapons during a demonstration organised by Al-Shabaab in 2010. (File picture). (AFP: Abdurashid Abikar)

Related Story: Somalia's Al Shabaab hits back with a vengeance

Map: Somalia

With Kenya's military saying it has successfully freed most of the hostages who were trapped in a shopping mall during a siege carried out by members of Al Qaeda-linked Al Shabaab, we take a closer look at the Somali terrorist group.

Al Shabaab is a Somali, clan-based insurgent and terrorist group. The name translates to "The Youth" in Arabic.

The members of Al Shabaab come from disparate groups and the agenda of the organisation is not centralised. However, it does impose its own version of Islamic law, which includes dress regulations and public mutilations.

The group's attacks have been focused on the Transitional Federal Government (TFG), the African Union Mission in Somalia (AUMIS), aid organisations and perceived allies of the TFG.

Al Shabaab's members are generally not supportive of global jihad.

What is the group's history?

Al Shabaab emerged out of an insurgency fighting against Ethiopia, when its troops entered Somalia in a 2006 US-backed invasion to topple the Islamic Courts Union that was in control of the Somali capital, Mogadishu.

It is the militant wing of the Somali Council of Islamic Courts. In 2008 the US named Al Shabaab a foreign terrorist organisation and a designated global terrorist entity. In 2011 the group blocked the delivery of aid during the famine that killed tens of thousands of Somalis. The following year a merger between Al Shabaab and Al Qaeda was publicly announced.

Who are Al Shabaab's leaders?

The group's senior leadership has been linked to Al Qaeda and is believed to have trained in Afghanistan.

  • Ahmed Abdi Aw-Mohamed, 34, is named by the US National Counterterrorism Centre as the founder of Al Shabaab. He has been responsible for the group's operations in Somalia and has served as a channel for financing the organisation. In 2007 he claimed the group was responsible for the assassination of a judge in Somalia. He also organised attacks on Ethiopian troops in Somalia during the same year.
  • Bashir Mohamed Mahamoud, 51, is a military commander of the group. The US National Counterterrorism Centre says he has been responsible for Al Qaeda activity in Somalia since 2007. The Somali national was in charge of a mortar attack against the TFG in Mogadishu in 2009.
  • Mukhtar Robow, 44, has served as a spokesperson, spiritual leader and military commander for the group. He was in command of forces that attacked government bases, Ethiopian forces and peacekeepers in Mogadishu in 2007. He and former leader Aden Hashi Ayrow (now deceased) were jointly responsible for a suicide attack at a TFG checkpoint that killed eight people in 2006.

Residents evacuate an injured man Photo: Residents evacuate an injured man from the scene of a suicide attack in Somalia's capital Mogadishu in October 2011. (Reuters: Omar Faruk )

What attacks has Al Shabaab carried out?

Al Shabaab has claimed responsibility for many attacks in Mogadishu and central and northern Somalia. Its attacks have focused on the TFG and its perceived allies, AUMIS and aid organisations. The group has assassinated peace activists, international aid workers and journalists.

In June 2013 the group carried out a complex attack on the United Nations base in Mogadishu. A suicide commando used car bombs and suicide attacks to blast their way into the compound before starting a gun battle to the death. The attack on the UN used similar tactics to an earlier one on a Mogadishu courthouse in April, which killed 34.

Earlier this month the group killed 18 people in a popular Mogadishu restaurant.

In 2010 Al Shabaab was responsible for twin bombings in Kampala, Uganda that killed 74 people who were watching the World Cup in a restaurant.

Also in 2011, the group claimed responsibility for a suicide attack in Mogadishu, when a truck bomb killed at least 65 people at a government building.

The rebels said this weekend's Nairobi attack was in direct retaliation for Kenya's military operations in Somalia.

Source: United States National Counterterrorism Centre

What is Al Shabaab and what are the Al Qaeda-linked terrorist group's motives? - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Friday, September 13, 2013

Judge allows Muslim woman to wear niqab in London court

Peter Walker and agency The Guardian, Friday 13 September 2013

Permission given for plea wearing face-covering on condition female police officer attested to woman's identity in private

Woman wears Muslim niqab

A woman wearing a niqab. An unnamed woman was allowed to make a plea at Blackfriars crown court in London after a female police officer had attested to her identity. Photograph: Jonathan Hordle/Rex Features

A Muslim woman has been allowed to make a plea in court while wearing a face-covering niqab after a judge agreed a compromise in which she was identified in private by a female police officer who then attested to her identity.

The judge in the case at Blackfriars crown court in London then heard arguments as to whether the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, should be allowed to wear the niqab, which leaves only her eyes showing, during her full trial. Judge Peter Murphy will give that decision on Monday.

The compromise follows a standoff when the woman, who is charged with witness intimidation, first appeared before Murphy in August. Then, he ordered her to remove the face covering, saying the requirement for her to be properly identified as the defendant overrode her religious beliefs. She refused, saying she did not want to uncover her face when there were men in the room, and the case was adjourned.

On Thursday he allowed her to plead not guilty in the dock wearing the niqab after a female police officer who saw the defendant's face when her custody photograph was taken witnessed her with the veil removed in a private room. The officer then swore on oath that the correct person was in court.

The woman's barrister, Susan Meek, said she was entitled to wear the niqab under the section of the European convention on human rights relating to religious beliefs.

"She is entitled to wear it in private and in public," Meek said. "That right to wear the niqab also extends to the courtroom. There is no legislation in the UK in respect of the wearing of the niqab. There is no law in this country banning it."

The court heard details from a similar case which reached Canada's supreme court last year after a judge ruled that a woman should remove her niqab when testifying in a sexual assault case so jurors could properly gauge her credibility as a witness. The supreme court eventually ruled such decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Meek argued that a jury would be able to assess the defendant from her answers and body language. She said: "Ultimately it's the choice of the defendant if she wishes to wear it.

"If she chooses to remain with her face veil on when giving evidence that is something she will no doubt be spoken to about by the judge in front of the jury.

"To ask her to remove it, if that is the court's opinion at the end of it, what consequences follow? A court order and proceedings of contempt? Is that right and fair?"

Judge allows Muslim woman to wear niqab in London court | World news | The Guardian

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Israel to pay $1.2 million compensation to family over death of Prisoner X Ben Zygier

By Trevor Bormann

Ben Zygier

Photo: Ben Zygier, known as Prisoner X, was found dead in a suicide-proof Israeli prison cell in 2010.

Related Story: Australian suspected of Mossad links dies in Israeli jail

Related Story: Carr demands answers on Zygier case

Related Story: Israel won't lay charges over Prisoner X death

Israel's Justice Ministry has confirmed that the family of former Australian Mossad agent Ben Zygier has negotiated a compensation package worth $1.2 million.

Zygier suicided in Israel's Ramla prison in 2010 after his secret arrest and incarceration. He was facing at least 10 years in prison for treason.

The agreement absolves the government for any blame over Mr Zygier’s death.

The Melbourne born dual citizen was discovered hanged by a sheet in his cell shortly after a visit from his wife in December 2010.

A judicial inquiry found that prison guards missed periodic checks of his high-tech cell and that at least one CCTV camera was not working. The inquiry also established that crucial information about Zygier's poor mental state was not passed on to prison medical personnel.

Timeline: Prisoner X case


Look back at the key developments surrounding Ben Zygier's death.

The existence and plight of Israel's so-called Prisoner X was revealed earlier this year by the ABC's Foreign Correspondent program.

The revelations led to a political scandal in Israel, with its feared overseas intelligence agency Mossad forced to review its recruiting procedures.

Earlier this year, Israeli attorney-general Moshe Lador admitted there were serious mistakes made by the prisons service in the supervision of Zygier, but there was not enough evidence to bring charges against personnel.

The Israeli television report claims the Zygier family will receive an immediate payout of $720,000 and payouts of $120,000 over the next four years.

Zygier is survived by his Israeli wife and two small children.

The family is being shielded by security authorities, with a court gag order preventing any approach from the media.

His parents Geoffrey and Louise are prominent leaders of Melbourne's Jewish community and are understood to have a central role in negotiations for compensation.

Geoffrey Zygier refused to comment when contacted by phone.

Video: Prisoner X: The Secret (Foreign Correspondent)

The ABC's Foreign Correspondent program report earlier this year revealed the Israeli government went to extraordinary lengths to cover up the Zygier's arrest and subsequent death.

When authorities were made aware of the story, they summoned the editors and owners of Israeli media to the office of the prime minister, where the head of Mossad urged them not to report the story.

The gag order eventually broke down in the midst of public debate about how Israel should manage its state secrets.

Authorities in Israel have refused to comment on the reasons behind Zygier's incarceration, but a subsequent story by the ABC's Foreign Correspondent claimed he sabotaged a Mossad mission to bring back the bodies of fallen soldiers in Lebanon.

The story claimed Zygier gave up the names of Lebanese informants to Mossad to an operative of Hezbollah.  

Israel to pay $1.2 million compensation to family over death of Prisoner X Ben Zygier - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Is Israel putting African asylum seekers at risk?

By Ben Lynfield, Correspondent / September 3, 2013

Israel said it struck a deal with an unnamed African country to take its asylum seekers. Human rights groups worry that country might send them to their homes – where they could be persecuted.

Sunday, a South Sudanese migrant worker, is comforted by friends in Tel Aviv, Israel, after two of her five children boarded a bus to Ben Gurion airport and thence to South Sudan, July 11, 2012. Ariel Schalit/AP/File

Jerusalem

Human rights groups are voicing concern over Israel's announcement that it has reached an agreement with an unnamed African country to transfer Sudanese and Eritrean asylum seekers in Israel there.

Although Israel succeeded in stemming an influx of African asylum seekers in recent years by erecting a fence along the border with Egypt, a political incentive lingers for the government to crack down on the nearly 60,000 asylum seekers, who leaders say are threatening the state's Jewish character.

The majority of the migrants live in slums in south Tel Aviv and other areas and are seen as a threat and source of crime by many of the lower-income Israelis who live alongside them.

The reported agreement, announced by Israel's interior minister, comes without customary international monitoring or any evidence of guarantees ensuring the safety of those to be deported. Human rights groups are voicing alarm. But Israel insists it will inform the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) of "all the relevant information" once the system for deportations is in place and that there is no cause for concern because the relocations will be "voluntary."

Asylum seekers fear that they could be returned to their home countries by whatever country they are transferred to by Israel, worries that are shared by Human Rights Watch and some with UNHCR The identity of the third country is being kept secret at its request, according to Yigal Palmor, Israeli foreign ministry spokesman. Israeli press reports have named Uganda as the country.

Leslie Susser, diplomatic editor of the Jerusalem Report magazine, says the move is in part aimed at pleasing voters of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party. "It makes good political sense to claim 'We are making a start in solving' what for Likud voters in south Tel Aviv is a problem."

On several occasions over the last year, Israeli residents of south Tel Aviv attacked and wounded asylum seekers and those they mistook for asylum seekers.

But the secrecy in which Israel is shrouding its arrangements creates an environment in which abuses can take place, Human Right Watch warns.

"On any issue involving rights, be they refugee rights or human rights more generally, transparency is of the utmost importance, to be able to see, to assess, how rights are handled,'' says Bill Frelick, refugee program director at Human Rights Watch. ''Any time you have secrecy involved in the actual transfer of people or in the agreement so that it can't be examined and compared to international standards, that certainly raises alarm bells.''

He says HRW is concerned about a possible repatriation to Eritrea and Sudan, where the asylum seekers could face threats to their safety, persecution and imprisonment.

Other international agreements on transfer of asylum seekers to third countries, like the US-Canada Safe Third Party Agreement, were made with UNHCR involvement and were open to public scrutiny, Mr. Frelick says. In the US-Canada agreement, he says, there is provision against returning asylum seekers to places where they would face persecution and that pact is predicated on each country having "non-refoulement" provisions – measures that block the expulsion of those who might be considered refugees – in its domestic law.

"There have been times Canadians questioned whether the US implements its non-refoulement provisions fairly and adequately in the case of Haitians. So it's not been without controversy but it's been open to scrutiny,'' Frelick adds.

Details fuzzy

An Israeli official familiar with the third country arrangements told the Monitor that he did not know if the agreement contains any safeguards against the asylum seekers being returned to Sudan or Eritrea.

''The important thing is that everyone leaving Israel will be doing so of their own free will. This is voluntary," he says.

However, refugee rights groups dispute that the departures will be voluntary, noting that Interior Minister Gideon Saar said when announcing the agreement last week that he will take steps to encourage the asylum seekers to leave. The minister's plan would also make it impossible for the seekers to continue working at their jobs, mostly as cleaners or restaurant workers.

Mr. Saar told Knesset legislators that Hagai Hadass, a former senior Israeli intelligence official, had struck the agreement.

"A few weeks ago an agreement was reached with a country. The arrangement was approved by the legal adviser to the government," Saar said. "In parallel, efforts will continue to reach agreements with more countries."

A spokesman for Uganda's foreign ministry said no agreement has been reached and Israeli officials, insisting on anonymity, now assert that Saar's announcement was premature. "An agreement is being discussed but no final conclusion has been reached," an official said.

But Saar said that after the Jewish holidays this month, an organized effort to arrange the departure of Eritreans and Sudanese would be launched.

No guarantees

About 50,000 Eritreans and Sudanese live in Israel. Most of them arrived in the last seven years, coming from Egypt overland via the Sinai Peninsula. Most of the Eritreans fled indefinite military conscription in their country, while many of the Sudanese come from Darfur or other war-torn parts of Sudan.

About 80 percent of Eritrean asylum seekers are recognized in the West as refugees and granted asylum, according to Human Rights Watch. But Israel has yet to recognize even a single Eritrean as a refugee, according to Sigal Rozen, spokeswoman of the Tel Aviv-based Hotline for Migrant Workers.

Mr. Palmor, the foreign ministry spokesman, says voluntary transfer of Sudanese and Eritreans to a third country is necessary, even though asylum seekers have all but stopped entering Israel in recent months due to a preventive fence erected along the border with Egypt.

"People who have infiltrated and not been recognized as refugees have no right to stay. Their whole process of entry was illegal to begin with," he says

Peter Deck, senior protection officer at the Israel office of UNHCR, says Israel has not consulted the agency over the third country arrangements.

"There are standard procedures for any arrangement of movement of asylum seekers. It is a concern to UNHCR that both Israel and the [other] country did not consult us. We have not been involved at all. Our concerns include the safety of the individuals and the risk of refoulement from that other location," he says.

Those fears have a foundation. In 2007, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert claimed – but did not prove – that he had assurances from Egypt that Sudanese refugees returned there by Israel would not be mistreated or sent back to Sudan.

However, a group of 48 refugees, most of them Sudanese, expelled by Israel within 24 hours after their arrival, without hearings, disappeared in Egypt. An investigation by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz found that at least five of the Sudanese were returned to Sudan. Sudan considers Israel an enemy state, and visiting it is a crime punishable by protracted imprisonment.

Amanuel Yamane, a leader of the Eritrean refugee community in Israel, fled the Eritrean army after 12 years of construction work and farming. He came to Israel almost six years ago, and says he is disappointed that Israel during that time did not check his claims to refugee status.

"People are very, very worried that soon we will be unable to take money out of the bank, rent an apartment or work. They will put pressure on us so that in the end a person signs their form," he says. "And tomorrow Uganda can make an agreement with Eritrea to return all the refugees."

Is Israel putting African asylum seekers at risk? - CSMonitor.com

Thousands of Islamists take to Egypt's streets again

By Yasmine Saleh CAIRO | Tue Sep 3, 2013

Members of the Muslim Brotherhood and supporters of ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi rally against the military and interior ministry, as they show the ''Rabaa'' or ''four'' gesture, in reference to the police clearing of Rabaa al-Adawiya protest camp on August 14, in the southern suburb of Maadi September 3, 2013. REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh

Members of the Muslim Brotherhood and supporters of ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi rally against the military and interior ministry, as they show the ''Rabaa'' or ''four'' gesture, in reference to the police clearing of Rabaa al-Adawiya protest camp on August 14, in the southern suburb of Maadi September 3, 2013. /Credit: Reuters/Amr Abdallah Dalsh

CAIRO (Reuters) - Thousands of supporters of overthrown Islamist president Mohamed Mursi took to the streets in towns and cities across Egypt on Tuesday evening to denounce Egypt's new military-backed rulers - their second show of mass support in four days.

Marking exactly two months since Egypt's first democratically elected leader was ousted by the army after big protests, marchers turned out in cities in the Nile Delta, in Upper Egypt and on the Suez Canal, as well as the capital, Cairo.

The army-led government has launched a furious crackdown on Mursi's Muslim Brotherhood since toppling him on July 3, arresting its top leaders and killing hundreds of his supporters.

But after a brief lull, and despite a heavy security presence, Islamist groups brought thousands onto the streets again after last Friday's prayers. There were sporadic clashes with security forces, notably in Cairo, and at least seven people died.

There were no immediate reports of violence at Tuesday's marches, held under the slogan "The Coup is Terrorism" - a reference to the government's portrayal of its campaign to crush the Brotherhood as a fight against Islamist terrorism.

In Cairo's Nasr City, near the presidential palace, hundreds of Brotherhood supporters waving Brotherhood flags chanted "Revolution, revolution, the revolution will continue!" and "Down, down with military rule!".

Some carried pictures of "martyrs" killed in the government's crackdown, while others stood chanting next to an armoured vehicle, one of many deployed in the capital.

Many of the Brotherhood's leaders including Mursi have already been sent to trial accused of inciting violence, but the movement says it is committed to peaceful protest, and that the accusations are a pretext for the crackdown by a "putschist regime".

A military court sentenced pro-Mursi protesters to long jail terms on Tuesday on charges of attacking soldiers in the city of Suez, a military statement said.

The violence in Suez broke out after security forces on August 14 crushed Cairo protest camps demanding Mursi's reinstatement. More than 600 Brotherhood supporters were killed, along with dozens of policemen, in the dawn operation, which triggered clashes across the country.

The statement said one person had been sentenced to life in prison for the Suez clashes, three people to 15 years in jail, and 45 others to five years.

TELEVISION CLOSURES

TV channels run by the Muslim Brotherhood or sympathetic to it have already fallen victim to the government crackdown.

On Tuesday a Cairo court ordered the closure of the Egyptian news channel belonging to Al Jazeera, the pan-Arab broadcaster financed by Qatar, a supporter of the Brotherhood, along with three other stations run by or sympathetic to the Brotherhood.

Al Jazeera's offices in Cairo have been closed since July 3, when they were raided by security forces hours after Mursi was toppled, although its channels, broadcast from Qatar, can still be seen in Egypt.

Last week, Al Jazeera aired statements from two Brotherhood leaders that included a call to join protests.

On Sunday, three journalists working for Al Jazeera's main, pan-Arab channel were deported from Egypt.

Separately, state-run Nile TV said 15 people had been killed in the Sinai Peninsula by rocket fire, after witnesses said army helicopters had attacked militant strongholds near Sheikh Zuweid, close to the border with Israel and the Gaza Strip.

Security sources said government helicopter strikes had killed at least eight armed men and wounded 15, and had been aimed at stores of arms and explosives.

Militant attacks on security forces in the lawless North Sinai region have grown since Mursi was ousted.

The army has accused Palestinians in Gaza, which is run by Hamas, a Brotherhood offshoot, of supporting the militants.

Mursi's government had made it easier for people and goods to travel between Egypt and Gaza.

But Cairo's new rulers have tightened controls once more, and have been closing smuggling tunnels that the army believes have been used to move weapons and gunmen across the border.

Local residents said on Tuesday that Egyptian security forces had destroyed some 20 houses along the border, apparently suspecting them of being used to hide tunnel entrances or provide cover for other militant activity.

Hamas said it feared Egypt was installing a buffer zone to isolate Gaza. An Egyptian army source confirmed the military had intensified its campaign to close tunnels but said he knew of no instructions to put a buffer zone in place.

Growing insecurity in Sinai worries the United States and others because the region is bounded not only by Israel and Gaza but also by the Suez Canal, a major global shipping artery. Last Saturday, attackers fired at a ship passing through the Canal.

(Writing by Kevin Liffey; editing by Tom Pfeiffer)

Thousands of Islamists take to Egypt's streets again | Reuters

Monday, September 2, 2013

Russian anti-gay law prompts rise in homophobic violence | World news | theguardian.com

Alec Luhn in Moscow theguardian.com, Monday 2 September 2013

Activists say legislation outlawing 'homosexual propaganda' has emboldened rightwing groups to step up attacks on gay people

Russian gay rights activist

A Russian gay rights activist holds a poster reading 'Love is stronger than homophobia!' after his detention at a rally in Moscow. Photograph: Kirill Kudryavtsev/AFP/Getty Images

Russia has experienced an upsurge in homophobic vigilantism following the introduction of legislation outlawing "homosexual propaganda" in June, gay and lesbian groups say.

The new laws, which have cast a shadow over the Winter Olympics to be held in Sochi early next year, ban the promotion of "non-traditional sexual relations" among minors.

Activists say the legislation has emboldened rightwing groups who use social media to "ambush" gay people, luring them to meetings and then humiliating them on camera – sometimes pouring urine on them. These groups often act against gay teenagers, several of whom told the Guardian that rising homophobia and vigilante activity force them to lead lives of secrecy.

The Russian LGBT Network said the harassment of gay people was being organised nationally for the first time through groups known as Occupy Gerontophilia and Occupy Paedophilia, who claim to be trying to "reform" homosexuals.

Igor Kochetkov, the head of the network, said Occupy Paedophilia – which focuses on gay adults – had uploaded hundreds of videos and garnered hundreds of thousands views on social media sites. Occupy Gerontophilia, which focuses on teenagers, had uploaded dozens of videos to the social network VKontakte before its page, which had 170,000 subscribers, was shut down for invading the privacy of minors.

"The latest laws against so-called gay propaganda, first in the regions and then on the federal level, have essentially legalised violence against LGBT people, because these groups of hooligans justify their actions with these laws," Kochetkov said. "With this legislation, the government said that, yes, gays and lesbians are not valued as a social group.

"It is an action to terrorise the entire LGBT community," he added.

Kochetkov said most homophobic violence was not reported to the police, but a recent study by his organisation found that of 20 attacks that had been reported recently, four were investigated and only one resulted in a court case. Russian law did not outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation, he said.

One gay teenager, Robert, who lives in the Siberian city of Kemerovo, said he narrowly avoided exposure at the hands of Occupy Gerontophilia.

"They tried to trick me into a meeting but I immediately saw the ruse," Robert said, recounting an online chat, supposedly with a 22-year-old man, who had offered him money to meet up. After being confronted, the man admitted he was from Occupy Gerontophilia, Robert said.

In a series of interviews with young homosexuals, the Guardian found that widespread fear means their relationships are nearly always clandestine and abuse is commonplace. As well as vigilante violence, they are also scared of negative reactions from family and friends. And if life in Moscow and St Petersburg is hard enough, then in the Russian provinces homosexuality is the love that dare not even whisper its name.

Recently an MP in the Siberian region of Zabaikalsk called for a law allowing gays to be publicly flogged by Cossacks.

Fifteen-year-old Robert said vigilante groups had expanded in his city following the new legislation. "In general, people's attitude here toward LGBT has worsened after long-running homophobic propaganda in the mass media," he said. "As soon as the hoopla started with the passage of the law, branches of organisations like Occupy Paedophilia and Occupy Gerontophilia appeared in our city."

Whereas the relatively cosmopolitan Moscow and St Petersburg have several gay clubs and bars – one of Moscow's best-known nightclubs, Propaganda, also hosts a gay party every Sunday night – other cities in Russia are generally more conservative. A poll in April found that 43% of Russians considered homosexuality to be "licentiousness, a bad habit" and 35% said it was an "illness or the result of psychological trauma".

Teenagers suffer the most from homophobia, and studies have found that LGBT youth commit suicide at much higher rates than their peers. People "scorn and hate lesbians, and hate and beat gays", said Lena, a 14-year-old from Abakan, a city of 170,000 in Siberia. She said an acquaintance had tried to trick her into going on a date with a girl. "It was a good thing my friend was able to talk me out of it, since I found out later that several homophobes were waiting for me there," she said.

Ruslan, a 17-year-old living in Tambov, where both Occupy Gerontophilia and Occupy Paedophilia have been particularly active, said he tried to "prepare a person" by talking about homosexuality in general before he told them about his sexual orientation. If they reacted negatively he wouldn't say anything. Most did, he said, adding that only his closest friends knew that he was gay.

"My parents are extremely conservative. If I tell them they will throw me out of the house," he said.

Marina, a 17-year-old who lives in the small city of Bronnitsy, in the Moscow region, said she tried to come out to her mother but "turned it into a joke" when she heard her mother's reaction. "I told her, 'I've fallen in love with a girl.' At first she said it was affection, not love, and then that I wouldn't be able to have children," Marina said. "Then I understood how limited her perception of same-sex couples is."

Artyom Reutov, a 15-year-old from the city of Veliky Ustyug, in the north of Russia, said his teachers were openly homophobic, suggesting that LGBT should be exiled or given compulsory medical treatment. "At the end of the last school year, I heard a ton of homophobic statements from teachers," Reutov said.

He hasn't come out to his conservative mother, who would prefer him to watch football rather than engage in his hobbies of drawing and singing. "If I was a bad student and hung out in the courtyard, drank and swore, it would be better [for her] than me being who I am now," he said.

The only public support is Deti-404, a group for LGBT teenagers that has pages on Facebook and VKontakte. Several times a day different users post photos, personal stories and statements of support. Several of the teenagers said the group had helped them come to terms with their orientation and find friends.

"I can go on [the Deti-404 site] and see that there are other teens with non-traditional orientations and people who wish me happiness and don't hate me," Lena said. "I write a lot. I can get all my emotions out and put them on the site, where people appreciate them."

Russian anti-gay law prompts rise in homophobic violence | World news | theguardian.com